首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine >Anticoagulation management of patients with long-term warfarin therapy after valve replacement during the perioperative period of pacemaker implantation
【24h】

Anticoagulation management of patients with long-term warfarin therapy after valve replacement during the perioperative period of pacemaker implantation

机译:心脏起搏器植入术中瓣膜置换术后长期华法林治疗的患者的抗凝治疗

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: To explore an optimal management of perioperative anticoagulation for patients with long-term warfarin therapy after valve replacement during the perioperative of pacemaker implantation. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients undergoing pacemaker implantation who received long-term warfarin therapy after valve replacements at our hospital. They were divided into 3 groups: discontinued group, bridging group and continued group. We analyzed the relationship between different anticoagulation methods during the peri-procedure period and hemorrhage and embolism events. Results: 132 patients were enrolled. There was no significant difference concerning the mean age, sex, concomitant diseases, atrial fibrillation and whether performed pacemaker replacement among 3 groups. The incidence of hematomas was irrespective of the perioperative anticoagulation strategy used (P = 0.125). A strategy involving bridging anticoagulation with therapeutic-dose heparin was associated with an incidence of wound errhysis (P = 0.008). There was no thromboembolism event in these three groups. Conclusion: The results showed that there was no significant difference in hematoma rate among continued group, discontinued group, and bridging group, but there was much more wound errhysis in the bridging group. Also, the study shows that if warfarin is continued, it will not increase the risk of bleeding when the International Normalized Ratio (INR) is around 1.7 during the procedure.
机译:背景:探讨起搏器植入术中瓣膜置换术后长期华法林治疗的患者围手术期抗凝的最佳管理。方法:我们回顾性分析了在我院更换瓣膜后接受长期华法林治疗的连续起搏器植入患者。他们分为3组:停药组,桥接组和继续组。我们分析了围手术期不同抗凝方法与出血和栓塞事件之间的关系。结果:132例患者入组。三组患者的平均年龄,性别,伴随疾病,心房颤动以及是否进行了起搏器替代治疗之间无显着差异。血肿的发生率与围手术期采用的抗凝治疗策略无关(P = 0.125)。涉及将抗凝剂与治疗剂量的肝素架桥的策略与伤口瘙痒的发生率相关(P = 0.008)。这三组均未发生血栓栓塞事件。结论:结果显示,连续组,停药组和桥接组之间的血肿发生率没有显着差异,但桥接组中的伤口出血更多。此外,研究表明,如果继续使用华法林,则在手术过程中国际标准化比率(INR)约为1.7时,不会增加出血的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号