...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Clinical Medicine >Early Surgery in Femoral Neck Fractures in Elderly: Does Preoperative ASA Score Matter?
【24h】

Early Surgery in Femoral Neck Fractures in Elderly: Does Preoperative ASA Score Matter?

机译:老年人股骨颈骨折的早期手术:术前ASA评分重要吗?

获取原文

摘要

Introduction: Early surgical treatment (within 48 hours) has been recommended for femoral neck fractures in order to avoid complications and reduce mortality rate, regardless of presence and severity of comorbidity and preoperative status (ASA score). However some studies evidenced that early surgery doesn’t always have a beneficial effect on mortality and complications. Therefore further studies could be useful in order to better assess risk related factors of patients requiring surgical treatment for femoral neck fracture. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of preoperative ASA score and timing of surgery on mortality, complications and clinical outcome. Methods: All 336 patients operated in our center from January 2013 to December 2014 were selected for this retrospective study. Patients were divided in three groups as follows: group 1 patients treated within 48 hours; group 2 patients treated between 48 to 96 hours; group 3 patients treated over 96 hours. The preoperative ASA score was recorded for each patient. Complication, clinical outcome and mortality at one-year follow-up were evaluated. At follow-up ambulation was graded as: confined to bed, assisted ambulation, and normal ambulation. Complications both local (infections, malunion, dislocation) and systemic (deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, lung infections, ischemic disorders of heart) were recorded as well as number of transfusions. Statistical analysis was performed with chi square test and P value Results: 308 patients’ data were fully available for this study. At one-year follow-up return to normal ambulation was higher for patients of group 1 as compared with group 2 and 3 and in group 2 as compared with group 3 (P = 0.04). There was no difference in mortality and return to ambulation between patients with ASA score 1 and 2 (P = 0.06); patients with ASA score ≥ 3 showed a statistically significant higher mortality (P = 0.004) and rate of complications (0.0008) regardless of timing of surgery. There was no statistically significance in blood transfusion among the three groups. Discussion and Conclusion: Clinical outcome, complications and mortality have been previously reported from many authors and most studies agreed that early surgical treatment is recommended regardless of age and preoperative status of the patient. The present study suggests that early surgical treatment is actually able to reduce mortality and complications and to improve clinical outcome in patients with better preoperative conditions, while for patients with ASA score ≥ 3 treatment within 48 hours seems not to prevent mortality and complications and improve clinical outcome.
机译:简介:建议对股骨颈骨折进行早期手术治疗(48小时内),以避免并发症并降低死亡率,而不论合并症和合并症的严重程度以及术前状态(ASA评分)如何。但是,一些研究表明,早期手术并不总是会对死亡率和并发症产生有益的影响。因此,为了更好地评估需要手术治疗股骨颈骨折的患者的风险相关因素,进一步的研究可能是有用的。这项研究的目的是评估术前ASA评分和手术时机对死亡率,并发症和临床结果的影响。方法:选择2013年1月至2014年12月在我中心手术的336例患者作为回顾性研究对象。将患者分为三组:第一组在48小时内接受治疗;第二组在48小时内接受治疗。第2组患者在48至96小时之间接受治疗;第3组患者治疗96小时以上。记录每位患者的术前ASA评分。评估一年随访的并发症,临床结局和死亡率。随访时,步行的等级为:卧床,辅助步行和正常步行。记录局部并发症(感染,畸形畸形,脱位)和全身性并发症(深静脉血栓形成,肺栓塞,肺部感染,心脏缺血性疾病)以及输血次数。用卡方检验和P值进行统计分析结果:308例患者的数据可用于该研究。在一年的随访中,第1组的患者恢复正常走动的频率高于第2组和第3组,第2组的患者则比第3组高(P = 0.04)。 ASA评分为1和2的患者之间的死亡率和恢复活动能力没有差异(P = 0.06);无论手术时机如何,ASA评分≥3的患者均具有统计学上显着较高的死亡率(P = 0.004)和并发症发生率(0.0008)。三组之间的输血无统计学意义。讨论和结论:先前已经有许多作者报道了临床结果,并发症和死亡率,并且大多数研究都认为无论患者年龄和术前状态如何,都建议早期手术治疗。本研究表明,早期手术治疗实际上能够降低术前状况较好的患者的死亡率和并发症,并改善临床结果,而对于ASA评分≥3的患者,在48小时内进行治疗似乎无法预防死亡率和并发症并改善临床结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号