首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of Anaesthesia >Safety and efficacy of transdermal buprenorphine versus oral tramadol for the treatment of post-operative pain following surgery for fracture neck of femur: A prospective, randomised clinical study
【24h】

Safety and efficacy of transdermal buprenorphine versus oral tramadol for the treatment of post-operative pain following surgery for fracture neck of femur: A prospective, randomised clinical study

机译:丁丙诺啡与口服曲马多经皮治疗股骨颈骨折术后疼痛的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性,随机临床研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Transdermal buprenorphine, which is used in chronic pain management, has rarely been studied for use in acute pain management. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of transdermal buprenorphine patch to oral tramadol for post-operative analgesia, following proximal femur surgeries. Methodology: Fifty adult patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture under spinal anaesthesia were included in this study. One group (Group TDB) received transdermal buprenorphine 10 mcg/h patch applied a day before the surgery and other group received oral tramadol 50 mg three times a day for analgesia (Group OT). They were allowed to take diclofenac and paracetamol tablets for rescue analgesia. Pain scores at rest, on movement, rescue analgesic requirement and side effects were compared between the groups over 7 days. Chi-square and independent sample t-test were used for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Results: Resting pain scores and pain on movement were significantly lower in TDB Group on all 7 days starting from 24 h post-operatively. Rescue analgesic requirement was significantly lower in TDB Group compared to OT Group. All the patients needed rescue analgesic in OT Group whereas 68% of the patients needed the same in TDB Group. Incidence of vomiting was less and satisfaction scores were much higher in TDB Group as compared to OT Group (79% vs. 66%, P Conclusion: Transdermal buprenorphine can be safely used for post-operative analgesia and is more efficacious in reducing post-operative pain after 24 hours, with fewer side effects when compared to oral tramadol.
机译:背景:用于慢性疼痛治疗的透皮丁丙诺啡很少用于急性疼痛治疗。这项研究的目的是比较股骨近端手术后丁丙诺啡透皮贴剂与曲马多口服镇痛的安全性和有效性。方法:本研究纳入了五十名在脊柱麻醉下接受髋部骨折手术的成年患者。一组(TDB组)在手术前一天接受了10 mcg / h的丁丙诺啡透皮贴剂,另一组每天3次口服曲马多50 mg用于镇痛(OT组)。他们被允许服用双氯芬酸和扑热息痛片进行抢救性镇痛。比较了7天各组在休息,运动,急救镇痛要求和副作用方面的疼痛评分。卡方检验和独立样本t检验分别用于分类变量和连续变量。结果:TDB组从术后24小时开始的所有7天的静息疼痛评分和运动疼痛均显着降低。与OT组相比,TDB组的急救镇痛要求显着降低。 OT组所有患者均需要抢救镇痛,而TDB组中68%的患者需要相同的镇痛。与OT组相比,TDB组的呕吐发生率更低,满意度得分高得多(79%比66%,P)结论:丁丙诺啡经皮可以安全地用于术后镇痛,并且在减少术后疼痛方面更有效24小时后疼痛,与口服曲马多相比副作用更少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号