首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of Anaesthesia >A comparative evaluation of Video Stylet and flexible fibre-optic bronchoscope in the performance of intubation in adult patients
【24h】

A comparative evaluation of Video Stylet and flexible fibre-optic bronchoscope in the performance of intubation in adult patients

机译:Video Stylet和柔性纤维支气管镜对成人患者插管性能的比较评价

获取原文
       

摘要

Background and Aims: Video Stylet (VS) is a new intubating modality that provides real-time video of endotracheal intubation (ETI). This device does not need alignment of the oral, pharyngeal and tracheal axes to view glottis and can be used in patients with limited mouth opening. The aim of this study was to compare flexible fibre-optic (FO) bronchoscope with VS in elective surgical patients in apparently normal airway patients requiring oral ETI. Methods: Sixty patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia of age group 20–60 years, weight 40–70 kg, American Society of Anesthesiologist 1 and 2 and modified Mallampatti I and II were included in the study. Patients in group FO (n = 30) were intubated by flexible FO bronchoscope, whereas patients in group VS (n = 30) were intubated by VS. Primary outcome measure was time taken for intubation (TTI). Secondary outcome measures were successful intubation, haemodynamic response and post-operative complications if any. Results: Average TTI in cases of FO group was 38.2 s (95% confidence interval [CI] 36–41) and in VS group was 19.7 s (95% CI 19–21; P = 0.0001). Three patients required a second attempt for successful intubation in FO group compared to eight in VS group (P = 0.2), with no failures in any group. Haemodynamic response and complications rate were greater in VS group; however, the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: VS takes lesser time to intubate than flexible FO bronchoscope.
机译:背景与目的:Video Stylet(VS)是一种新型插管方式,可提供气管插管(ETI)的实时视频。该设备不需要对准口腔,咽和气管轴即可看到声门,并且可以用于张口受限的患者。这项研究的目的是在需要口服ETI的明显正常气道患者中,对选择性手术患者中的柔性光纤(FO)支气管镜与VS进行比较。方法:本研究包括60名年龄在20-60岁,体重40-70 kg,美国麻醉医师学会1和2以及改良的Mallampatti I和II进行全身麻醉的择期手术患者。 FO组(n = 30)的患者通过挠性FO支气管镜插管,而VS组(n = 30)的患者通过VS气管插管。主要结局指标为插管时间(TTI)。次要结果指标是成功插管,血液动力学反应和术后并发症(如有)。结果:FO组平均TTI为38.2 s(95%置信区间[CI] 36–41),而VS组为19.7 s(95%CI 19-21; P = 0.0001)。 FO组有3例需要第二次成功插管,而VS组为8例(P = 0.2),任何组均未失败。 VS组血流动力学反应和并发症发生率较高;但是,差异在统计上并不显着。结论:VS比柔性FO支气管镜花费更少的时间进行插管。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号