首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of Anaesthesia >Comparative evaluation of subclavian vein catheterisation using supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of subclavian vein catheterisation using supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach

机译:锁骨上与锁骨下方法锁骨下静脉插管的比较评估

获取原文
       

摘要

Background and Aims:Infraclavicular (IC) approach of subclavian vein (SCV) catheterisation is widely used as compared to supraclavicular (SC) approach. The aim of the study was to compare the ease of catheterisation of SCV using SC versus IC approach and also record the incidence of complications related to either approach, if any.Methods:In the study, 60 patients enrolled were randomly divided into two groups of 30 patients each. In Gp. SC right SCV catheterisation was performed using SC approach and in Gp. IC catheterisation was performed using IC approach. Access time, success rate of cannulation, number of attempts to cannulate vein, ease of guidewire and catheter insertion and length of catheter inserted and any associated complications were recorded.Results:The mean access time in group SC for SCV catheterisation was 4.30 ± 1.02 min compared to 6.07 ± 2.14 min in group IC. The overall success rate in catheterisation of the right SCV using SC approach (29 out of 30) was better as compared with group IC (27 out of 30) using IC approach. First attempt success in the SC group was 75.6% as compared with 59.25% in the IC group. All successful subclavian vein? catheterisations in SC group and IC group were associated with smooth insertion of guidewire following subclavian venipuncture.Conclusion:The SC approach of SCV catheterisation is comparable to IC approach in terms of landmarks accessibility, success rate and rate of complications.
机译:背景与目的:锁骨下静脉(SCV)锁骨下(IC)入路与锁骨上(SC)入路相比被广泛使用。该研究的目的是比较使用SC与IC方法进行SCV的导管插入的难易程度,并记录与这两种方法相关的并发症发生率。方法:在研究中,将60名患者随机分为两组每个30位患者。在Gp中。 SC右SCV导管插入术使用SC入路并在Gp中进行。使用IC方法进行IC导管插入术。记录入路时间,插管成功率,插管尝试次数,导丝和导管插入的难易程度以及插入的导管长度以及任何相关并发症。结果:SC组SCV导管插入的平均入路时间为4.30±1.02分钟相比之下,IC组为6.07±2.14分钟。与使用IC方法的IC组(30个中的27个)相比,使用SC方法对右SCV进行导管插入的总成功率(30个中的27个)更好。 SC组的首次尝试成功率为75.6%,而IC组为59.25%。所有成功的锁骨下静脉?结论:SCV导管置入的SC方法在路标可及性,成功率和并发症发生率方面可与IC方法相媲美。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号