首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Biomedical Research >Rapid Nitrite Dip Stick Vs Urine culture for diagnosis of Urinary tract Infections (UTI): Laboratory prospective
【24h】

Rapid Nitrite Dip Stick Vs Urine culture for diagnosis of Urinary tract Infections (UTI): Laboratory prospective

机译:快速亚硝酸盐浸试纸与尿液培养对尿路感染(UTI)的诊断:实验室前瞻性

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Urinary tract infection common bacterial disease with all age group causing lower to complicated UTI leading to life threatening condition urosepsis. Urine culture is gold standard however urine dipstick test can help in early detection of UTI by avoiding the complication of UTI. The study aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy of rapid nitrate dip stick test with urine culture and identify the common uropathogens and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern.Materials and Methods: Clean catch mid stream urine samples from suspected cases of UTI were evaluated by rapid nitrate dip stick and culture. The culture isolates were identified and antimicrobial susceptibility test was performed following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines.Results: Total of 202 urine specimens evaluated, out of which 46(22.77%) were positive for rapid nitrate dip stick test, but 42(20.79%) were culture positive. Among the culture positives, nitrate test was positive in 29(69.04%). Gram-negative bacilli were predominant (95.25%), Escherichia coli (21) being most frequent isolate followed by Enterobacter (6), Klebsiella (5) and Acinetobacter (3). The GNB were mostly susceptible to imipenam (75%), amikacin (62.5%) and cotrimoxazole 45%. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of nitrite test in relation to culture were calculated to be 69.04%, 89.4%, 63.0% and 91.6%, respectively but the value of pyuria in relation to culture was 36%, 60%, 68% and 55%, respectively.Conclusion: The study reveals that the rapid nitrate dip stick test can be used in conjunction with urine culture for diagnosis of UTI but cannot replace it entirely.
机译:背景:尿路感染是所有年龄段的常见细菌性疾病,会导致尿道感染降低至复杂,导致危及生命的尿毒症。尿液培养是金标准,但尿液试纸法可避免尿路感染的并发症,有助于早期检测尿路感染。本研究旨在比较快速硝酸盐试纸棒试验与尿液培养的诊断准确性,并确定常见的尿路病原菌及其抗菌药性模式。材料和方法:通过快速硝酸盐试纸棒对疑似尿路感染病例的中游尿液样本进行清洁评估和文化。鉴定培养物并按照临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)指导方针进行了药敏试验。结果:共评估了202个尿液样本,其中46个(22.77%)的快速硝酸盐试纸检测呈阳性,但42个(20.79%)为文化阳性。在培养阳性中,硝酸盐试验阳性的有29例(69.04%)。革兰阴性杆菌占多数(95.25%),大肠杆菌(21)是最常见的分离株,其次是肠杆菌(6),克雷伯菌(5)和不动杆菌(3)。 GNB最容易受到伊米帕南(75%),丁胺卡那霉素(62.5%)和45%卡曲美唑的影响。亚硝酸盐测试相对于培养的总体敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性预测值分别为69.04%,89.4%,63.0%和91.6%,而脓尿症相对于培养的值为36%,60%结论:该研究表明,快速硝酸盐试纸棒试验可与尿培养一起用于诊断尿路感染,但不能完全替代尿道感染。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号