...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research >A Comparative Study of Posterior Approach versus Lateral Approach in Surgical Management of Intra-capsular Neck Femur Fractures
【24h】

A Comparative Study of Posterior Approach versus Lateral Approach in Surgical Management of Intra-capsular Neck Femur Fractures

机译:后入路与侧入路在囊内颈股骨骨折手术治疗中的比较研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Aims and Objective: The present study was undertaken to evaluate and compared relevant early surgical complications rates after posterior and lateral approach. Methods: A total 80 patients of either sex, age between 50-80 years with intracapsular neck femur fracture were operated with hemiarthroplasty. Patients were divided in two equal groups i.e. group A and B operated with posterior and lateral approach respectively. Several variables including age, sex, operative time, blood loss, early surgical and post-operative complications, post-operative care, hip function and final outcome measures were noted and compared between two groups. Results: The mean age of patients was 64.30 5.39 years in group A and 65.85 5.64 years in group B with female to male ratio was 1.6:1 for group A and 1.4:1 for group B. Operating time for group A and for group B was 48.435.38 and 47.507.59 minutes respectively. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 144.7517.68 ml in group A and 148.3815.03 ml in group B. The most common complication in both the groups was infection and rate in group A was 17.50% and in group B was 12.50%. Posterior approach carries an increased risk of prosthetic dislocation as compared to lateral approach. There was no intraoperative mortality seen in follow up period. The rate of secondary procedures was high with posterior approach (12.5%) as compared to lateral approach (7.5%). The average Harris Hip Score was 85.62% in group A and 83.40% in group B. Conclusion: The rate of early surgical complications and outcome measures after posterior and lateral approaches is not significantly different. A larger randomized trial or may be a multicentre trial can further improve the interpretation of the results.
机译:目的和目的:本研究旨在评估和比较后路和侧路入路后相关的早期手术并发症发生率。方法:共80例年龄在50-80岁之间,囊内颈股骨骨折的患者,均接受半髋置换术。将患者分为两个相等的组,即分别采用后入路和外侧入路的A组和B组。记录并比较了两组变量,包括年龄,性别,手术时间,失血量,早期手术和术后并发症,术后护理,髋关节功能和最终结局指标。结果:A组患者的平均年龄为64.30 5.39岁,B组为65.85 5.64岁,男女比例A组为1.6:1,B组为1.4:1。A组和B组的手术时间是48.435.38分钟和47.507.59分钟。 A组平均术中失血量为144.7517.68 ml,B组平均为148.3815.03 ml。两组中最常见的并发症是感染,A组的发生率为17.50%,B组的为12.50%。与外侧入路相比,后入路会增加假体脱位的风险。随访期间未见术中死亡率。后路入路(12.5%)与侧路入路(7.5%)相比,二次手术的发生率较高。 A组的平均Harris髋关节评分为85.62%,B组的平均为83.40%。结论:后路和外侧入路后早期手术并发症的发生率和结局指标无显着差异。较大的随机试验或多中心试验可以进一步改善结果的解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号