首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology >Comparative evaluation of efficacy of terbinafine and itraconazole in treatment of tinea cruris
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of efficacy of terbinafine and itraconazole in treatment of tinea cruris

机译:特比萘芬和伊曲康唑治疗股癣的疗效比较评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: In a hot and humid country like India, the prevalence of superficial mycotic infections is on the rise due to contributing environmental and demographic factors. In this study, we sought to assess the efficacies of two oral antifungal drugs, Itraconazole (a traditional azole) and Terbinafine (the only orally available allylamine). The two drugs were analyzed to see whether they differed significantly in their cure rates of tinea cruris. Since data, that compares only systemically administered Itraconazole and Terbinafine in the treatment of tinea cruris, is limited, this study becomes imperative. Methods: 60 patients, all clinically confirmed cases of tinea cruris and belonging to the age group of 18-65 years, were recruited for this prospective study. Patients were then randomly divided into groups A and B and followed-up for a month. Group A received cap. Itraconazole 100 mg, twice a day, for 15 days while group B received tab. Terbinafine 250 mg, once a day, for 4 weeks. Both groups were given topical 2% Sertaconazole that had to be continued for 8 weeks. During the 4 visits, scores for the 3 parameters (erythema, pruritis and scaling) were calculated and recorded for statistical analysis. Results: Authors observed that majority of the patients were exposed to hot and humid environment that contributed to sweating and poor personal hygiene. The changes in scores of erythema, pruritis and scaling from the baseline visit for both, Itraconazole and Terbinafine, were statistically significant at week 4 with P 0.05 for all parameters. But the difference between the scores of the two drugs was not found to be statistically significant. Conclusions: Although the sample size of this study was small and the data was limited, findings of this study supported that both Itraconazole and Terbinafine were highly effective in the treatment of tinea cruris.
机译:背景:在炎热潮湿的国家(如印度),由于环境和人口因素的影响,浅表真菌感染的流行率正在上升。在这项研究中,我们试图评估两种口服抗真菌药伊曲康唑(传统的唑)和特比萘芬(唯一的口服烯丙胺)的疗效。对这两种药物进行了分析,看它们在癣的治愈率上是否有显着差异。由于仅比较全身使用伊曲康唑和特比萘芬治疗股癣的数据有限,因此这项研究势在必行。方法:招募了60例均在临床上确诊为头癣的患者,年龄在18-65岁之间,参加了这项前瞻性研究。然后将患者随机分为A组和B组,并随访一个月。 A组获得上限。 Itraconazole 100 mg,每天两次,持续15天,而B组接受Tab。特比萘芬250毫克,每天一次,持续4周。两组均给予局部2%舍他康唑,必须持续8周。在4次就诊期间,计算并记录了3个参数(红斑,瘙痒和结垢)的得分,并进行统计分析。结果:作者观察到,大多数患者暴露于炎热潮湿的环境中,导致出汗和个人卫生状况差。在第4周,伊曲康唑和特比萘芬的基线访视红斑,瘙痒炎和结垢评分的变化在统计学上均具有统计学意义,所有参数均P <0.05。但是,两种药物的得分之间的差异未发现具有统计学意义。结论:尽管本研究的样本量很小且数据有限,但本研究的发现支持伊曲康唑和特比萘芬均在治疗股癣方面非常有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号