...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology >Efficacy and tolerability of milnacipran and escitalopram: a comparative study among patients of depression
【24h】

Efficacy and tolerability of milnacipran and escitalopram: a comparative study among patients of depression

机译:米那普仑和依他普仑的疗效和耐受性:抑郁症患者的比较研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: The present prospective, open labelled study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of escitalopram, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) in comparison with milnacipran, dual serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRI) in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Methods: Outpatients (N=120) with an ongoingewly diagnosed ICD-10 major depressive episode and having a minimum score of 8 on the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) were assigned to escitalopram, 10–20 mg/day (54 patients) and milnacipran 50-100mg (66 patients), for an 8 week treatment period with follow up at 2nd, 4th and 8th week. The parameters for efficacy were improvement (decrease in HDRS scores at 8 weeks from baseline values), response (decrease of ≥50% in the HDRS scores) and remission (HDRS score of ≤7). Tolerability was assessed by comparing the frequency of adverse effects and drop out rate due to the same at the end of 2nd, 4th and 8th week in both the groups. Results: Improvement, Response rate and Remission rates at the end of eight weeks were 71.11%, 83.33% and58.33% for escitalopram and 59.35%, 34.14% and75.6% for milnacipran respectively. Adverse experiences were reported by 14% of patients in escitalopram group and 79.2% patients in milnacipran group at 8 weeks. Additionally, there were significantly lesser dropouts due to adverse events in escitalopram (3.70%) than in milnacipran group (30%). Conclusions: Escitalopram, the Senantiomer of citalopram, is a safe and effective antidepressant with potentially superior tolerability and comparable efficacy to the dual reuptake inhibitor, Milnacipran.
机译:背景:本前瞻性,开放标签研究旨在评估依他普仑,选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)与米那普仑,双重5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRI)相比在重度抑郁症中的疗效和耐受性。方法:将正在/刚诊断为ICD-10重度抑郁发作且门诊21项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS)的最低分数为8的门诊患者(N = 120)分配给依他普仑10-20 mg /天(54例)和米那普仑50-100mg(66例),为期8周的治疗期,在第2、4和8周进行随访。疗效的参数包括改善(从基线值开始第8周HDRS得分降低),反应(HDRS得分降低≥50%)和缓解(HDRS得分≤7)。通过比较两组在第2、4和8周末的不良反应发生频率和辍学率,评估耐受性。结果:艾司西酞普兰的改善率,缓解率和缓解率在八周结束时分别为71.11%,83.33%和58.33%,而米那普仑分别为59.35%,34.14%和75.6%。依他普仑组8周时不良反应的报道为14%,米那普仑组为79.2%。此外,依他普仑的不良事件导致的辍学率(3.70%)明显低于米那普仑组(30%)。结论:西酞普兰是西酞普兰的对映异构体,是一种安全有效的抗抑郁药,与双重再摄取抑制剂Milnacipran相比可能具有更高的耐受性和相当的疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号