...
首页> 外文期刊>International heart journal >Influence of Diabetes Mellitus on Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease Treated With Either Drug-Eluting Stents or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
【24h】

Influence of Diabetes Mellitus on Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease Treated With Either Drug-Eluting Stents or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

机译:糖尿病对药物洗脱支架或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗未保护的左主干冠状动脉疾病患者长期结局的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Whether the effect of diabetes on patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease differs according to different strategies of revascularization was unknown. This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of diabetes on patients with ULMCA disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG). A total of 922 patients with ULMCA disease who received drug-eluting stent (DES) ( n = 465) implantation or underwent CABG ( n = 457) were retrospectively analyzed. We compared the effects of these 2 treatments on clinical outcomes (death, myocardial infarction, stroke, repeat revascularization, and the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke), according to diabetic status. During the median follow-up of 7.1 years (interquartile range, 5.3 to 8.2 years), no difference was found between PCI and CABG in the adjusted occurrence of death ( P = 0.112) and the composite endpoints of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke ( P = 0.235). Significantly higher incidence of repeat revascularization ( P interaction = 0.580 for the composite of death, MI and stroke, P interaction = 0.685 for death, P interaction = 0.416 for MI, P interaction = 0.470 for stroke, and P interaction = 0.502 for repeat revascularization). Presence of diabetes was not important for decision-making between CABG and PCI in patients with ULMCA disease.
机译:尚不清楚糖尿病对无保护的左主冠状动脉(ULMCA)疾病患者的影响是否根据不同的血运重建策略而有所不同。进行这项研究以评估糖尿病对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)或冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)治疗的ULMCA疾病患者的影响。回顾性分析了922例接受药物洗脱支架(DES)植入或接受CABG(n = 457)的ULMCA疾病患者。根据糖尿病状况,我们比较了这两种治疗对临床结局(死亡,心肌梗塞,中风,重复血运重建以及死亡,心肌梗塞或中风的综合)的影响。在中位随访7.1年(四分位间距为5.3至8.2年)期间,在调整的死亡发生率(P = 0.112)以及死亡,心肌梗塞和中风的复合终点方面,PCI和CABG之间无差异(P = 0.235)。重复血运重建的发生率显着更高(死亡,心梗和中风的复合物的P相互作用 = 0.580,死亡的P 相互作用 = 0.685,P 相互作用 = 0.416对于MI,对于卒中,P interaction = 0.470,对于重复血运重建,P interaction = 0.502)。糖尿病的存在对于ULMCA疾病患者CABG和PCI之间的决策并不重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号