...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology >Comparison between didactic lectures and small group discussions among second year medical undergraduates in pharmacology
【24h】

Comparison between didactic lectures and small group discussions among second year medical undergraduates in pharmacology

机译:药理学二年级医学生的教学讲课和小组讨论的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: The drawbacks associated with didactic lectures can be overcome by small group discussions (SGDs) which involve a limited number of participants, produce interaction, allow better understanding of concepts, and critical thinking. The objectives of our study were to assess the preferences of 2nd year medical undergraduates between the didactic lectures and the SGDs and the enhancement of knowledge by SGDs in Pharmacology. Methods: This is a mixed (qualitative and quantitative), interventional study, conducted in 2nd MBBS students (n=130). After obtaining the informed consent and Institutional Ethics Committee clearance, the pre and post-tests (20 MCQs) before and after the didactic lectures were conducted. Second set of pre and post-tests with different and validated MCQs of the same topic were conducted before and after 3 SGDs. The preferences of the students between these 2 methods were also assessed using 10 parameters. The results were analysed by paired and unpaired?t? test and percentages. Results: The means (Standard Deviation [SD]) of the scores obtained by the students before and after didactic lectures were 7.53 (2.27) and 9.02 (2.92), respectively and before and after SGDs were 8.2 (1.95) and 11.42 (2.74), respectively. When the means of post-tests of lectures and SGDs were compared using unpaired?t-test' the difference was extremely significant with the P value of.
机译:背景:与教学法相关的弊端可以通过小组讨论(SGD)来克服,小组讨论涉及的参与者数量有限,可以进行互动,可以更好地理解概念和批判性思维。我们研究的目的是评估2年制医学本科生在讲授性讲座和SGD之间的偏好以及SGD在药理学方面的知识提升。方法:这是一项混合的(定性和定量)干预性研究,对第二名MBBS学生(n = 130)进行。在获得知情同意并获得机构伦理委员会的批准后,在讲课之前和之后进行了测验前和测验(20个MCQ)。在3个SGD之前和之后,使用相同主题的不同且经过验证的MCQ进行第二组预测试和后测试。还使用10个参数评估了这两种方法之间学生的偏好。通过配对和非配对分析结果。测试和百分比。结果:学生在讲课之前和之后的平均得分(标准差[SD])分别为7.53(2.27)和9.02(2.92),而SGD前后的得分分别为8.2(1.95)和11.42(2.74) , 分别。当使用不配对的“ t检验”比较演讲的后测和SGD的方法时,差异的P值极为显着。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号