首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology >Descriptive analysis of theory examination question papers of 2nd MBBS pharmacology of Krantiguru Shamji Krishna Verma Kachchh University (Gujarat)
【24h】

Descriptive analysis of theory examination question papers of 2nd MBBS pharmacology of Krantiguru Shamji Krishna Verma Kachchh University (Gujarat)

机译:Krantiguru Shamji Krishna Verma Kachchh大学(古吉拉特邦)第二届MBBS药理学理论考试试卷的描述性分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: The Question Paper is the most important tool of theory exam examination. An attempt was made to assess the pharmacology question papers of university examination in accordance with their guidelines. To assess the pharmacology theory question papers for content validity, area of importance and to test the level of cognitive domain. Methods: Twenty four papers of university comprising 695 questions after preparing 520 learning objective were analysed. All questions were analysed for coverage of different subdivision of Pharmacology and marks allotted to them, type of taxonomic level of each question asked on the basis of verb use and percentage of question asked from area of importance. Results: It was observed that 18.40% weightage of marks given to general pharmacology and least .67% for immunosuppressant in paper I whereas in paper II, 34.90% for antimicrobial agents. About 84% questions were asked from must know area, 8.07% from nice to know area and 7.90 from desirable to know area. In paper I, 92.08% of the questions were to test factual recall (Bloom level I), remaining 07.93% were reasoning type but in other paper verbs were used to test only lower cognitive domain. Conclusions: All the sub-divisions of pharmacology were not covered in each theory assessment. Majority of questions were asked to test lower level of cognitive domain. Theory question papers should be designed to give proper weightage to whole subject area. Blue printing of theory question papers is absolutely necessary.
机译:背景:试卷是理论考试的最重要工具。试图根据其指导方针评估大学考试的药理试卷。评估药理学理论试卷的内容有效性,重要领域并测试认知领域的水平。方法:在准备520个学习目标后,对24篇大学论文进行695题的分析。对所有问题进行了分析,以涵盖药理学不同细分的覆盖范围,并为其分配标记,基于动词使用而提出的每个问题的分类水平类型以及从重要领域提出的问题的百分比。结果:观察到,在纸I中,给予一般药理学的标记的权重为18.40%,对免疫抑制剂的标记为至少6.67%,而在纸II中,抗微生物剂为34.90%。大约84%的问题来自必须知道的区域,8.07%的问题来自熟悉的区域,而7.90的问题来自理想的已知区域。在论文I中,92.08%的问题用于测试事实回忆(Bloom I级),其余的07.93%是推理类型,但在其他论文中,动词仅用于测试较低的认知领域。结论:每次理论评估均未涵盖药理学的所有细分领域。多数问题被要求测试较低水平的认知领域。理论试卷应设计成对整个学科领域给予适当权重。理论试卷的印刷本是绝对必要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号