首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology >A comparative study of total intravenous anesthesia with propofol/ketamine and propofol/tramadol combinations in orthopedic outpatient procedures
【24h】

A comparative study of total intravenous anesthesia with propofol/ketamine and propofol/tramadol combinations in orthopedic outpatient procedures

机译:骨科门诊手术中丙泊酚/氯胺酮和丙泊酚/曲马多全静脉麻醉的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Propofol opioidonopioid combinations provide adequate analgesia during and after surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of anesthesia with propofol/ketamine versus propofol/tramadol on the haemodynamic parameters and pain in patients undergoing orthopaedic outpatient surgical procedures. Methods: Fifty patients with ASA status I-II between the age group of 20-50 years undergoing orthopaedic outpatient surgical procedures under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to propofol/ ketamine (n=25, group I) and propofol/ tramadol (n=25, group II) groups. Patients in group I were induced with propofol 150 μg/kg/min IV and ketamine 50 μg/kg/min IV and in group II induction was performed with propofol 150 μg/kg/min IV and tramadol 1 mg/kg/min. IV. The hemodynamic parameters, oxygen saturation (SpO2), respiration rate, sedation and pain were measured before and after induction at predefined time points and were compared between groups. Results: There was significant difference between groups in systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR). SBP, DBP and HR were stable in patients induced with propofol/ketamine. The SBP, DBP and HR decreased significantly after induction with propofol/tramadol compared to premedication, but tends to return to normal after 25 minutes. No significant changes in SpO2 found in both the groups at all-time points. Both groups are sedated and showed no difference in pain score with few episodes of unpleasant dreams or hallucinations or adverse complications. Conclusions: Propofol/tramadol anesthesia in patients undergoing orthopaedic procedures provided stable hemodynamic and respiratory stability, sedation and pain reduction as effective as propofol/ketamine anesthesia.
机译:背景:丙泊酚阿片类/诺非阿片类药物组合可在手术期间和术后提供足够的镇痛作用。这项研究的目的是比较麻醉和异丙酚/氯胺酮与丙泊酚/曲马多对骨科门诊手术患者血液动力学参数和疼痛的影响。方法:将50名年龄在20-50岁之间,在全麻状态下接受整形外科门诊手术的ASA状态为I-II的患者随机分为丙泊酚/氯胺酮(n = 25,I组)和丙泊酚/曲马多(n = 25)。 ,第二组)组。第一组患者用异丙酚150μg/ kg / min IV和氯胺酮50μg/ kg / min IV诱导;在第二组中,丙泊酚150μg/ kg / min IV和曲马多1 mg / kg / min进行诱导。 IV。在诱导之前和之后的预定时间点测量血流动力学参数,血氧饱和度(SpO2),呼吸频率,镇静和疼痛,并在各组之间进行比较。结果:两组之间的收缩压(SBP),舒张压(DBP),心率(HR)存在显着差异。异丙酚/氯胺酮诱发的患者的SBP,DBP和HR稳定。与前药相比,异丙酚/曲马多诱导后的SBP,DBP和HR显着降低,但在25分钟后趋于恢复正常。两组在所有时间点的SpO2均无明显变化。两组均使用镇静剂,疼痛评分无差异,很少发生不愉快的梦境或幻觉或不良并发症。结论:接受整形外科手术的患者使用异丙酚/曲马多麻醉可提供与异丙酚/氯胺酮麻醉相同的稳定的血液动力学和呼吸稳定性,镇静作用和减轻疼痛的效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号