首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Advances in Pharmaceutical Research >THE PRIVATE-PUBLIC-DIVIDE ON THE ECONOMICS OF ESSENTIAL MEDICINES IN MEKELLE, NORTHERN ETHIOPIA: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS ON THE NATIONAL DRUG POLICY OUTCOMES
【24h】

THE PRIVATE-PUBLIC-DIVIDE ON THE ECONOMICS OF ESSENTIAL MEDICINES IN MEKELLE, NORTHERN ETHIOPIA: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS ON THE NATIONAL DRUG POLICY OUTCOMES

机译:北部埃塞俄比亚梅凯勒的基本药物经济学的私立区划:对国家药物政策结果的批判性分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Essential medicines (EMs) save lives and improve health. But still, lack of access to EMs remains to be one of the most serious global public health problems. This study evaluates patient price, availability and affordability of essential medicines in Mekelle, and compares the private and public health care facilities with respect to these parameters. A cross-sectional prospective survey was conducted using WHO/HAI standardized methods for surveying medicines' prices, availability, affordability, and price components in low-income countries with the necessary adjustments in line with local situations. The patient price of lowest price generic (LPGs) products in private pharmacies and drug shops were 1.90 and 1.62 times patient price in public Health care facilities (PHCFs), respectively. The overall % availability of the selected EMs in PHCFs, private drug shops (PDSs) and private pharmacies (PPs) were found to be 81.25%, 86.25% and 90%, respectively. There were no innovator brand products in PHCFs and their overall availability were 16.67% in PPs and 11.11% in PDSs. In PHCFs and private drug retail outlets (PDROs), treatment costs of combination of diseases were found to consume more than 1 day's wage of lowest paid unskilled Ethiopian government worker. The patient prices of EMs in PHCFs were more affordable as compared to private ventures. There was a better availability of EMs in private health care facilities. In both private and public health facilities, most of the treatment costs of preselected disease conditions appeared to be unaffordable suggesting the need to devise appropriate pricing policy options.
机译:基本药物(EMs)可以挽救生命并改善健康。但是,仍然缺乏获得新兴市场的机会仍然是最严重的全球公共卫生问题之一。这项研究评估了梅克勒(Mekelle)患者的基本药物的价格,可获得性和可负担性,并就这些参数比较了私人和公共卫生保健机构。使用WHO / HAI标准化方法进行横断面前瞻性调查,以调查低收入国家的药品价格,可获得性,可负担性和价格成分,并根据当地情况进行必要的调整。私人药房和药店的最低价仿制药产品的患者价格分别是公共卫生保健机构(PHCF)中患者价格的1.90倍和1.62倍。在PHCF,私人药店(PDS)和私人药房(PP)中,选定的EM的总体可用性百分比分别为81.25%,86.25%和90%。 PHCF中没有创新品牌产品,PP的整体可用性为16.67%,PDS的整体可用性为11.11%。在PHCF和私营药品零售店(PDRO)中,发现疾病组合的治疗费用消耗了最低薪水的非埃塞俄比亚政府工作人员1天的工资。与私营企业相比,初级卫生保健基金中新兴市场企业的耐心价格更为可承受。私营医疗机构中有更多的新兴市场。在私人和公共卫生机构中,大多数预选疾病的治疗费用似乎负担不起,这表明需要制定适当的定价政策选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号