...
首页> 外文期刊>Internal medicine. >Correlation Between the Brachial Blood Pressure Values Obtained Using the Cuff Method and the Central Blood Pressure Values Obtained Invasively
【24h】

Correlation Between the Brachial Blood Pressure Values Obtained Using the Cuff Method and the Central Blood Pressure Values Obtained Invasively

机译:使用袖带法获得的肱动脉血压值与有创获得的中心血压值之间的相关性

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective This study was designed to identify why the central blood pressure (cSBP) values obtained using the catheter method tend to be higher than brachial systolic blood pressure (bSBP) values obtained using the cuff method. Methods This study enrolled 20 patients who underwent coronary angiography (CAG) (mean age, 68.9 years; 13 men). Using the catheter method, a pressure guide wire was inserted via the radial artery at the time of CAG to measure the cSBP. The guide wire was then removed and the bSBP was obtained using two methods (the pressure guide wire method and the cuff method). The cSBP obtained with the catheter and the bSBP obtained with the cuff were compared, as were the bSBP obtained with the cuff and the bSBP obtained with the catheter. Results The cSBP obtained with the catheter was 4.6 mmHg higher than the bSBP obtained with the cuff. The bSBP obtained with the cuff was 8.3 mmHg lower than the bSBP obtained with the catheter. The cSBP obtained with the catheter was 1.7 mmHg lower than the bSBP obtained with the catheter. Conclusion In elderly patients with evident or suspected coronary heart disease, the finding of a higher cSBP measured using the catheter method than the bSBP obtained using the cuff method is attributable to bSBP underestimation (by 8.3 mmHg) using the cuff method compared to the bSBP directly obtained using the catheter method.
机译:目的本研究旨在确定为什么使用导管法获得的中心血压(cSBP)值往往高于使用袖带法获得的肱动脉收缩压(bSBP)值。方法本研究招募了20例行冠状动脉造影(CAG)的患者(平均年龄68.9岁; 13例男性)。使用导管法,在CAG时通过the动脉插入压力导丝以测量cSBP。然后去除导丝,并使用两种方法(压力导丝法和袖带法)获得bSBP。比较了通过导管获得的cSBP和通过袖带获得的bSBP,以及通过袖带获得的bSBP和通过导管获得的bSBP。结果导管获得的cSBP比袖带获得的bSBP高4.6 mmHg。用袖带获得的bSBP比用导管获得的bSBP低8.3 mmHg。通过导管获得的cSBP比通过导管获得的bSBP低1.7 mmHg。结论在患有明显或疑似冠心病的老年患者中,使用导管法测得的cSBP高于使用袖套法获得的bSBP的原因是,与直接使用bSBP相比,使用袖套法测得的bSBP低估了8.3 mmHg。使用导管方法获得。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号