...
首页> 外文期刊>Insights into Imaging >Density is in the eye of the beholder: visual versus semi-automated assessment of breast density on standard mammograms
【24h】

Density is in the eye of the beholder: visual versus semi-automated assessment of breast density on standard mammograms

机译:密度在旁观者的眼中:在标准乳房X光照片上视觉对比半自动评估乳房密度

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives Visual inspection is generally used to assess breast density. Our study aim was to compare visual assessment of breast density of experienced and inexperienced readers with semi-automated analysis of breast density. Methods Breast density was assessed by an experienced and an inexperienced reader in 200 mammograms and scored according to the quantitative BI-RADS classification. Breast density was also assessed by dedicated software using a semi-automated thresholding technique. Agreement between breast density classification of both readers as well as agreement between their assessment versus the semi-automated analysis as reference standard was expressed as the weighted kappa value. Results Using the semi-automated analysis, agreement between breast density measurements of both breasts in both projections was excellent (ICC >0.9, P?0.8, P?
机译:目的目视检查通常用于评估乳房密度。我们的研究目标是比较有经验和没有经验的读者对乳房密度的视觉评估与半自动乳房密度分析。方法由经验丰富和经验不足的读者在200例乳房X线照片中评估乳房密度,并根据定量BI-RADS分类进行评分。还通过专用软件使用半自动阈值技术评估了乳房密度。两位读者的乳房密度分类之间的一致性,以及他们的评估与作为参考标准的半自动分析之间的一致性,表示为加权卡伯值。结果使用半自动分析,两个投影的两个乳房的乳房密度测量之间的一致性非常好(ICC> 0.9,P <0.8,P 0.0001)。有经验的读者在58.5%的病例中正确地将BI-RADS乳房密度分类归类。在35.5%的案例中,分类被高估,而在6.0%的案例中,分类被低估。没有经验的读者的结果不太准确。两种阅读器的分类与半自动分析之间的一致性被认为只有中等,加权kappa值为0.367(有经验的阅读器)和0.232(无经验的阅读器)。结论在乳房X线照片上视觉评估乳房密度是不准确的,并且取决于观察者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号