...
首页> 外文期刊>International Affairs and Global Strategy >The EU-Africa Economic Partnership Agreements: Any Way Out?
【24h】

The EU-Africa Economic Partnership Agreements: Any Way Out?

机译:欧盟-非洲经济伙伴关系协定:有何出路?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Economic Partnership Agreements (EPA) being negotiated by the EU and African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Countries are already causing great concern, because they threaten to undermine economic development in some of the World’s poorest and most vulnerable countries. That is, the EPAs, the European Union’s much vaunted trade and development agreements with ACP countries, are in complete disarry.Despite the passing of a key negotiating deadlines at the end of 2007 and 2009, and relentless pressure from European Commission (EC) negotiators, many countries in Africa have refused to sign any form of EPA (even though some have lost their tariff preferences as a result). The overall consequences for their economies are simply too threatening. That is African countries have little to gain from EPAs and are participating simply to try and retain their existing trade preferences with the EU. But it seems they have a great deal to lose if they sign up to and implement EPAs. There is a significant chance that EPAs will increase poverty and hunger, rather the reduce them, and have negative impacts on environment. This paper therefore suggests that the European Union must find alternative routes to assist ACP countries to develop fair and sustainable societies”
机译:欧盟与非洲,加勒比海和太平洋(ACP)国家正在谈判的经济伙伴协议(EPA)已经引起了极大的关注,因为它们威胁着破坏世界上一些最贫穷和最脆弱国家的经济发展。就是说,尽管EPA与ACP国家之间备受鼓吹的贸易和发展协议EPA完全被废除。尽管在2007年和2009年底关键的谈判截止日期过去了,并且来自欧盟委员会(EC)谈判者的不懈压力,许多非洲国家拒绝签署任何形式的EPA(即使有些国家因此失去了关税优惠)。对其经济的总体后果简直太具有威胁性。这就是说,非洲国家从EPA中获益不多,只是为了保持与欧盟的现有贸易优惠而参加。但是,如果他们签署并实施EPA,似乎他们将损失很多。持久授权书有很大的机会增加而不是减少贫穷和饥饿,并对环境产生负面影响。因此,本文建议欧洲联盟必须找到替代途径,以协助非加太国家发展公平和可持续的社会。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号