首页> 外文期刊>Insights into Imaging >Response to invited commentary: “Event-based versus process-based informed consent to address scientific evidence and uncertainties in ionizing medical imaging” by Recchia et al
【24h】

Response to invited commentary: “Event-based versus process-based informed consent to address scientific evidence and uncertainties in ionizing medical imaging” by Recchia et al

机译:对邀请评论的回应:Recchia等人的“基于事件的基于过程的知情同意,以解决电离医学成像中的科学证据和不确定性”

获取原文
           

摘要

We thank Prof. Vock for his noteworthy and constructive commentary [1]. This gives us the opportunity to briefly provide additional observations to elaborate this topic further. We agree with Prof. Vock that our theoretical approach [2] may not be applied in a non-invasive and low-dose medical imaging. Nevertheless, this makes the innovation that we are trying to develop even more challenging. We are all discussing about something similar to a “paradigm shift”, in the sense described by Kuhn [3]: (a) presenting results “sufficiently unprecedented to attract an enduring group of adherents away from competing modes of scientific activity” and (b) “being sufficiently open-ended to leave all sorts of problems for the redefined group of practitioners to solve.”
机译:我们感谢沃克教授的引人注目的建设性评论[1]。这使我们有机会简要提供其他意见,以进一步阐述该主题。我们同意Vock教授的观点,我们的理论方法[2]可能不会应用于无创,低剂量的医学成像中。但是,这使我们正在尝试开发的创新更具挑战性。从库恩[3]的意义上来说,我们都在讨论类似于“范式转换”的事物:(a)提出的结果“足够空前,以吸引持久的信奉者远离竞争性的科学活动模式”和(b )“具有足够的开放性,可以为重新定义的从业者群体解决各种问题。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号