...
首页> 外文期刊>Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery >To clip or coil? Proposal of individual decision making
【24h】

To clip or coil? Proposal of individual decision making

机译:夹或盘绕?个人决策建议

获取原文

摘要

BackgroundOnce the decision is made to treat the intracranial aneurysm, we should consider between two competing treatment options; open surgery or endovascular therapy. The rationale underlying the choice of treatment modality is usually unclear, as there is little good quality evidence available.MethodsWe discuss here the patient, risk factors and the aneurysm related factors for decision making in management of intracranial aneurysm between endovascular and microsurgical modalities of management.ResultsThe relevance of age of patient, modifiable and nonmodifiable risk actors, family history, rupture status of aneurysm, aneurysm related factors like morphology of aneurysm and multiplicity are discussed here. Perceived differences in efficacy and safety of the two different treatment approaches are commonly used in an attempt to justify treatment choices. Difficulties with treatment selection and case to case management plan should be considered.ConclusionProperly designed and randomized controlled trials need to be done to address these issues for choosing best management to the patient and definitive guidelines must be made to solve this confusion.
机译:背景一旦决定要治疗颅内动脉瘤,我们应该在两种竞争性治疗方案之间进行考虑。开放手术或血管内治疗。选择治疗方式的基本原理通常尚不清楚,因为目前尚无质量良好的证据。方法我们在此讨论在血管内和显微外科手术治疗方式之间进行颅内动脉瘤治疗决策的患者,危险因素和与动脉瘤相关的因素。结果讨论了患者年龄,可改变和不可改变的危险因素,家族史,动脉瘤破裂状态,动脉瘤相关因素(如动脉瘤的形态和多样性)的相关性。两种不同治疗方法在功效和安全性方面的感知差异通常用于试图证明治疗选择的合理性。结论应考虑治疗选择的困难和个案管理计划。结论需要进行正确设计和随机对照的试验来解决这些问题,以便为患者选择最佳治疗方法,并且必须制定明确的指导方针以解决这种困惑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号