...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Ophthalmology >Comparison of Plusoptix S12R photoscreener with cycloplegic retinoscopy and autorefraction in pediatric age group
【24h】

Comparison of Plusoptix S12R photoscreener with cycloplegic retinoscopy and autorefraction in pediatric age group

机译:小儿年龄组Plusoptix S12R光筛与睫状肌麻痹检影和自动验光的比较

获取原文

摘要

Purpose: To compare refractive measurements of noncycloplegic photoscreener Plusoptix S12R with cycloplegic retinoscopy, noncycloplegic autorefractor, and cycloplegic autorefractor in children. Methods: The study population (200 eyes of 100 children) was divided into two groups: Group 1 (age 3–7 years) and Group 2 (age 8–15 years). In Group 1, Plusoptix was compared with cycloplegic retinoscopy. In Group 2, Plusoptix was compared with cycloplegic retinoscopy and autorefraction. The second group was made because the younger group was found to be uncooperative for autorefraction. Paired t-test and Pearson's correlation were used for statistical analysis. Results: The mean difference in sphere (DS), spherical equivalent (DSE), and cylinder (DC) between cycloplegic retinoscopy and Plusoptix in Group 1 was 0.68 ± 0.55 (P 0.001), 0.77 ± 0.61 (P 0.001), and 0.18 ± 0.28 (P 0.001), respectively. In Group 2, DS, DSE, and DC between cycloplegic retinoscopy and Plusoptix were 0.86 ± 0.49 (P 0.001), 0.97 ± 0.51 (P 0.001), and 0.23 ± 0.28 (P 0.001); between cycloplegic autorefractor and Plusoptix were 0.69 ± 0.47 (P 0.001), 0.74 ± 0.49 (P 0.001), and 0.10 ± 0.31 (P = 0.002); and between noncycloplegic autorefractor and Plusoptix were ? 0.25 ± 0.39 (P 0.001), ?0.19 ± 0.41 (P 0.001), and 0.11 ± 0.31 (P 0.001), respectively. Pearson's correlation coefficients of S, SE, and C between Plusoptix and cycloplegic retinoscopy were 0.948, 0.938, and 0.924 in Group 1 and 0.972, 0.972, and 0.946 in Group 2, and these values were statistically significant. Bland–Altman plots showed good agreement between cycloplegic retinoscopy and Plusoptix in both groups. Plusoptix gave axis values within 10° of cycloplegic retinoscopy in 81.56% of eyes in Group 1 and in 71.44% of eyes in Group 2. Conclusion: Plusoptix photoscreener can be used for prescription of axis of cylinder in children; however, other refractive measurements must be refined by cycloplegic retinoscopy.
机译:目的:比较儿童非睫状肌麻痹光筛Plusoptix S12R与睫状肌麻痹检影,非睫状肌自动验光仪和睫状肌麻痹自动验光仪的屈光测量结果。方法:将研究人群(100名儿童中的200只眼)分为两组:第一组(3至7岁)和第二组(8至15岁)。在第1组中,将Plusoptix与睫状肌麻痹性检影术进行了比较。在第2组中,将Plusoptix与睫状肌麻痹检影和自动验光进行了比较。第二组是因为发现较年轻的组不适合进行自动验光。配对t检验和Pearson相关性用于统计分析。结果:第一组的睫状肌麻痹检影和Plusoptix球镜(DS),球当量(DSE)和圆柱体(DC)的平均差分别为0.68±0.55(P <0.001),0.77±0.61(P <0.001)和分别为0.18±0.28(P <0.001)。在第2组中,睫状肌麻痹检影和Plusoptix之间的DS,DSE和DC为0.86±0.49(P <0.001),0.97±0.51(P <0.001)和0.23±0.28(P <0.001);睫状肌麻痹型自动验光仪和Plusoptix之间的差异为0.69±0.47(P <0.001),0.74±0.49(P <0.001)和0.10±0.31(P = 0.002);非屈光性验光机和Plusoptix之间是?分别为0.25±0.39(P <0.001)、? 0.19±0.41(P <0.001)和0.11±0.31(P <0.001)。在第1组中,Plusoptix和睫状肌麻痹检影法之间皮尔逊的S,SE和C相关系数分别为0.948、0.938和0.924,在第2组中分别为0.972、0.972和0.946,这些值具有统计学意义。 Bland–Altman图显示两组的睫状肌麻痹性检影和Plusoptix吻合良好。 Plusoptix在第1组的81.56%的眼睛和第2组的71.44%的眼睛的睫状肌麻痹检影镜10°范围内给出轴值。但是,其他屈光测量必须通过睫状肌麻痹检影镜进行完善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号