首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Ophthalmology >Comparison of visual acuity estimates using three different letter charts under two ambient room illuminations
【24h】

Comparison of visual acuity estimates using three different letter charts under two ambient room illuminations

机译:在两个环境室内照明下使用三个不同的字母图比较视力估计值

获取原文
           

摘要

Background:Visual acuity is an essential estimate to assess ability of the visual system and is used as an indicator of ocular health status.Aim:The aim of this study is to investigate the consistency of acuity estimates from three different clinical visual acuity charts under two levels of ambient room illumination.Materials and Methods:This study involved thirty Malay university students aged between 19 and 23 years old (7 males, 23 females), with their spherical refractive error ranging between plano and –7.75D, astigmatism ranging from plano to –1.75D, anisometropia less than 1.00D and with no history of ocular injury or pathology. Right eye visual acuity (recorded in logMAR unit) was measured with Snellen letter chart (Snellen), wall mounted letter chart (WM) and projected letter chart (PC) under two ambient room illuminations, room light on and room light off.Results:Visual acuity estimates showed no statistically significant difference when measured with the room light on and with the room light off (F1,372 = 0.26, P = 0.61). Post-hoc analysis with Tukey showed that visual acuity estimates were significantly different between the Snellen and PC (P = 0.009) and between Snellen and WM (P = 0.002).Conclusions:Different levels of ambient room illumination had no significant effect on visual acuity estimates. However, the discrepancies in estimates of visual acuity noted in this study were purely due to the type of letter chart used.
机译:背景:视敏度是评估视力系统能力的一项重要指标,用作眼部健康状况的指标。目的:本研究的目的是研究两种不同情况下三种不同临床视敏度表的视敏度估算值的一致性材料和方法:这项研究涉及30名年龄在19至23岁之间的马来大学生(男7名,女23名),他们的球面屈光度误差在平光度至–7.75D之间,散光的范围从平视度到平视度。 –1.75D,屈光参差小于1.00D,无眼外伤或病理史。右眼视力(以logMAR单位记录)在两个环境室内照明,室内照明开启和室内照明关闭的情况下,使用Snellen字母图(Snellen),壁挂式字母图(WM)和投影字母图(PC)进行了测量。在打开和关闭房间照明的情况下进行视敏度估计时,没有统计学上的显着差异(F1,372 = 0.26,P = 0.61)。用Tukey进行事后分析表明,Snellen和PC之间(P = 0.009)以及Snellen和WM之间(P = 0.002)的视力估计值存在显着差异。结论:不同水平的室内照度对视力没有显着影响估计。但是,这项研究中指出的视敏度估计值的差异完全是由于所使用的字母图类型所致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号