...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of public health. >Personal vis-a-vis social responsibility for disparities in health status: An issue of justice
【24h】

Personal vis-a-vis social responsibility for disparities in health status: An issue of justice

机译:个人对健康状况差异的社会责任:司法问题

获取原文

摘要

Health inequities are disparities which can be avoided through rational actions on the part of policymakers. Such inequalities are unnecessary andunjust and may exist between and within nations, societies, and population groups. Social determinants such as wealth, income, occupation,education, gender, and racial/ethnic groups are the principal drivers of this inequality since they determine the health risks and preventive behaviors,access to, and affordability of health care. Within this framework, there is a debate on assigning a personal responsibility factor over and abovesocietal responsibility to issues of ill health. One school of philosophy argues that when individuals are worse-off than others for no fault of theirown, it is unjust, as opposed to health disparities that arise due to avoidable personal choices such as smoking and drug addiction for which thereshould (can) be a personal responsibility. Opposing thoughts have pointed out that the relative socioeconomic position of an individual dictates howhis/her life may progress from education to working conditions and aging, susceptibility to diseases and infirmity, and the consequences thereof.The existence of a social gradient in health outcomes across populations throughout the world is a testimony to this truth. It has been emphasizedthat assuming personal responsibility for health in public policy-making can only have a peripheral place. Instead, the concept of individualresponsibility should be promoted as a positive concept of enabling people to gain control over the determinants of health through conscious,informed, and healthy choices.
机译:卫生不平等是差距,可以通过决策者采取合理行动来避免。这种不平等是不必要和不公正的,并且可能存在于国家,社会和人口群体之间和内部。社会决定因素,例如财富,收入,职业,教育,性别和种族/族裔群体,是造成这种不平等的主要因素,因为它们决定了健康风险和预防行为,医疗服务的可及性和可负担性。在此框架内,存在着关于将个人责任因素分配给健康不良问题的社会责任的争论。一所哲学流派认为,当个人由于没有自己的过错而比别人处境更糟时,这是不公正的,这与由于可避免的个人选择(例如吸烟和吸毒)而引起的健康差异相反,而吸烟和吸毒成瘾会导致健康差异。个人的责任。反对意见指出,一个人的相对社会经济地位决定了他/她的生活可能从教育到工作条件和衰老,疾病和体弱多病的易感性及其后果。全世界都证明了这一真理。人们强调,在公共决策中承担个人的健康责任只能处于边缘地位。相反,应该提倡个人责任的概念,使之成为一个积极的概念,使人们能够通过有意识,知情和健康的选择来控制健康的决定因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号