...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of psychiatry >A cross-sectional comparison of disability and quality of life in euthymic patients with bipolar affective or recurrent depressive disorder with and without comorbid chronic medical illness
【24h】

A cross-sectional comparison of disability and quality of life in euthymic patients with bipolar affective or recurrent depressive disorder with and without comorbid chronic medical illness

机译:患有和不患有合并性慢性医学疾病的双相情感或复发性抑郁症的正常患者的残疾和生活质量的横断面比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background:There are major health care implications of quality of life (QOL) and disability in long-standing disorders such as bipolar affective disorder (BAD) and recurrent depressive disorder (RDD).Objectives:To compare the inter-episode QOL and disability in patients with the diagnosis of BAD or RDD in remission with and without comorbid chronic medical illness.Materials and Methods:Cross-sectional assessments of the four groups were carried out. Euthymic bipolar or RDD subjects with chronic comorbid medical illnesses were included in the study. QOL assessment was carried out using the World Health Organization (WHO)-QOL - Bref Kannada version. Disability was assessed using the Schedule for Assessment of Psychiatric Disability (SAPD), which is an Indian modification of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule-II.Results:Eighty patients were enrolled into the study (20 patients in each group). The mean disability scores in the BAD group was significantly more in ‘social role’ (P = 0.038), and in the RDD group it was more in ‘home atmosphere’ (P = 0.001) in the two groups (n = 40) with chronic comorbid medical illness. In the other group without comorbid chronic medical illness (n = 40), the BAD group had significantly more disability in ‘overall behavior’ (P = 0.002) and ‘social role’ (P = 0.001), and the RDD group had significantly more disability in ‘assets and/or liabilities’ (P = 0.004) and ‘home atmosphere’ (P = 0.001). The QOL measures did not differ significantly between the two disorders.Conclusions:The presence of chronic comorbid medical illness did not cause a difference in the QOL between the two groups in periods of euthymia. However, disability measures differed significantly between the groups.
机译:背景:长期生活的疾病如双相情感障碍(BAD)和复发性抑郁症(RDD)对生活质量(QOL)和残疾有重大的医疗保健意义。诊断为BAD或RDD且有缓解且无合并症的慢性病患者。材料与方法:对四组患者进行横断面评估。该研究包括患有慢性合并症的正常人双相情感障碍或RDD受试者。使用世界卫生组织(WHO)-QOL-Bref Kannada版本进行QOL评估。使用《精神障碍评估表》(SAPD)对残疾进行评估,该表是印度对WHO残疾评估表II的修改。结果:该研究招募了80名患者(每组20名患者)。 BAD组的平均残疾评分在“社交角色”中显着更高(P = 0.038),而在RDD组中,两组(n = 40)在“家庭氛围”中的平均残疾评分更高(P = 0.001)。慢性合并症。在另一组没有合并症的慢性医学疾病中(n = 40),BAD组在“总体行为”(P = 0.002)和“社会角色”(P = 0.001)上的残疾明显更多,而RDD组在“整体行为”(P = 0.001)上的残疾更多。 “资产和/或负债”中的残疾(P = 0.004)和“家庭氛围”中的残疾(P = 0.001)。两种疾病之间的生活质量无显着性差异。结论:慢性合并症的存在并没有导致两组在听觉障碍期间的生活质量差异。但是,各组之间的残疾措施差异很大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号