...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of psychiatry >A 6-week, multicentre, randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of placeboxetine hydrochloride in the treatment of major depressive disorder in an Indian setting
【24h】

A 6-week, multicentre, randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of placeboxetine hydrochloride in the treatment of major depressive disorder in an Indian setting

机译:一项为期6周的多中心,随机对照临床试验,用于评估盐酸洛哌西汀治疗印度主要抑郁症的安全性和有效性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction:This paper describes a fictitious study of a fictitious drug. A companion paper in this issue of the Indian J Psychiatry critically examines this paper and provides author, reader, reviewer, and researcher perspectives on problems related to the design and conduct of a clinical trial; on issues related to the analysis of data; on how to write a research paper; and on how to critically read or review a journal article. Readers are invited to appraise this paper and then compare their assessment with that presented in the companion paper.Background:This study sought to compare the safety and efficacy of placeboxetine (PB) hydrochloride extended release capsules with sertraline hydrochloride in patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder in 15 general hospitals in south India.Materials and Methods:In a prospective, open-label, 15-center, randomized controlled clinical trial, consecutive outpatients diagnosed with major depressive disorder of at least moderate severity were randomized 1:1 to receive flexible doses of either PB or sertraline once each morning. Patients were evaluated every two weeks, until the study endpoint, using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and the Montgomery-Asberg Rating Scale (MADRS). Safety was determined through assessments of vital signs, adverse events, study discontinuation rates, hematological parameters, metabolic parameters, electrocardiography, and other measures.Results:Ten patients dropped out of the study from each treatment arm. There was a significant, marked improvement in HAM-D and MADRS scores in each group by the treatment endpoint. There was no significant difference between PB and sertraline groups on either HAM-D or MADRS at any visit. The response rate was 90% with PB and 92% with sertraline. The remission rate was 70% with PB and 75% with sertraline. All laboratory parameters were within normal limits in all patients. There were no serious adverse events.Conclusions:Placeboxetine is as safe and effective as sertraline in Indian patients with major depressive disorder.
机译:简介:本文介绍了一种虚拟药物的虚拟研究。本期《印度J精神病学》的一篇伴随论文对本论文进行了严格的审查,并就与临床试验的设计和进行有关的问题提供了作者,读者,评论者和研究人员的观点;与数据分析有关的问题;关于如何撰写研究论文的信息;以及如何批判地阅读或审阅期刊文章。请读者对本文进行评估,然后将其评估结果与随附的论文进行比较。背景:本研究旨在比较盐酸舍波西汀(PB)缓释胶囊与舍曲林盐酸盐在诊断为重度抑郁症患者中的安全性和有效性材料和方法:在一项前瞻性,开放标签,15个中心的随机对照临床试验中,将连续被诊断出患有严重抑郁症的中度严重程度至少为中度的连续门诊患者以1:1的比例随机分配每天早晨一次PB或舍曲林。每两周评估一次患者,直至研究终点,使用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)和蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格量表(MADRS)。通过评估生命体征,不良事件,研究中止率,血液学参数,代谢参数,心电图和其他措施来确定安全性。结果:十名患者从每个治疗组退出研究。通过治疗终点,每组的HAM-D和MADRS得分都有显着,显着的改善。每次随访时,HAM-D或MADRS的PB和舍曲林组之间无显着差异。 PB的响应率为90%,舍曲林的响应率为92%。 PB的缓解率为70%,舍曲林的缓解率为75%。所有患者的所有实验室参数均在正常范围内。没有严重的不良事件。结论:在患有严重抑郁症的印度患者中,Placeboxetine与舍曲林一样安全有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号