首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Neonatal Medicine and Research >Pre Feed Aspirates vs Abdominal Girth Monitoring for Detection of Feed Intolerance in VLBW Babies
【24h】

Pre Feed Aspirates vs Abdominal Girth Monitoring for Detection of Feed Intolerance in VLBW Babies

机译:喂奶前吸气与腹围监测,以检测VLBW婴儿的喂奶不耐受

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction: Feed intolerance is well known in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) and is linked to morbidity and mortality in Very Low Birth Weight (VLBW) babies. Most definitions of feed intolerance include one or more of clinical criteria’s viz. pre feed Gastric Residual Volumes (GRVs), colour of gastric aspirates, abdominal distension, emesis, bloody stools and clinical deterioration (increase in apnoea and/or bradycardia) resulting in discontinuation of feeding. But clinical significance of each of these criteria has not been studied systematically. Aim: To compare the role of abdominal girth monitoring vs pre feed residuals in prediction of feed intolerance, fasting hours, time to reach full feeds, incidence of Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) II, and weight gain in VLBW babies. Materials and Methods: This prospective, two centre trial was conducted in the NICUs of two Tertiary Care Hospitals. Total 60 VLBW babies (30 from each hospital) on gavage feeding were enrolled. VLBW babies on gavage feeds at Faridabad Escort Hospital (FEH)-Pre feed Aspiration group (PA) and Hindu Rao Hospital (HRH)-Abdominal Girth monitoring group (AG) were studied. The outcome variables were vomiting, apnoea, bradycardia, fasting hours, days to reach full feeds, NEC-II and weight gain. Results: Lesser feed were found in AG group and fasting hours (p=0.015), days to reach full feeds (p=0.001) were significantly less and weight gain (p=0.02) was significantly more in AG group as compared to PA group. Conclusion: Monitoring feed intolerance by pre feed abdominal girth had advantage of better weight gain and fewer fasting hours and days to reach full feeds compared to pre feed aspiration in VLBW babies. Abdominal girth monitoring is less invasive and equally effective as pre feed aspiration.
机译:简介:饲料不耐受在新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)中是众所周知的,并且与极低出生体重(VLBW)婴儿的发病率和死亡率有关。饲料不耐受的大多数定义都包括一项或多项临床标准。喂食前的胃残余容积(GRV),胃抽吸物的颜色,腹胀,呕吐,大便带血和临床恶化(呼吸暂停和/或心动过缓增加),导致停止喂食。但是,尚未对这些标准的临床意义进行系统研究。目的:比较腹围监测和饲喂残渣在预测饲料耐受不良,禁食时间,完全饲喂时间,坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)II的发生率以及VLBW婴儿体重增加中的作用。材料和方法:这项前瞻性,两个中心的试验在两家三级医院的重症监护病房中进行。总共入选了60只VLBW婴儿(每家医院30名)进行管饲喂养。研究了法里达巴德护送医院(FEH)-喂食前抽吸组(PA)和印度教饶医院(HRH)-腹围监测组(AG)的管饲饲料中的VLBW婴儿。结果变量为呕吐,呼吸暂停,心动过缓,禁食时间,全日制进食天数,NEC-II和体重增加。结果:与PA组相比,AG组的饲料较少,禁食时间(p = 0.015),全日饲料的天数(p = 0.001)显着减少,增重(p = 0.02)明显多于PA组。结论:与VLBW婴儿的预饲吸入相比,预饲腹围监测饲喂不耐受具有增加体重,减少空腹时间和减少全日饲喂的优势。腹围监测的侵入性较小,并且与喂食前抽吸同样有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号