首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >Feasibility and impact of implementing a private care system’s diabetes quality improvement intervention in the safety net: a cluster-randomized trial
【24h】

Feasibility and impact of implementing a private care system’s diabetes quality improvement intervention in the safety net: a cluster-randomized trial

机译:在安全网中实施私人护理系统的糖尿病质量改善干预措施的可行性和影响:一项集群随机试验

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Integrated health care delivery systems devote considerable resources to developing quality improvement (QI) interventions. Clinics serving vulnerable populations rarely have the resources for such development but might benefit greatly from implementing approaches shown to be effective in other settings. Little trial-based research has assessed the feasibility and impact of such cross-setting translation and implementation in community health centers (CHCs). We hypothesized that it would be feasible to implement successful QI interventions from integrated care settings in CHCs and would positively impact the CHCs. Methods We adapted Kaiser Permanente’s successful intervention, which targets guideline-based cardioprotective prescribing for patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), through an iterative, stakeholder-driven process. We then conducted a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial in 11 CHCs in a staggered process with six “early” CHCs implementing the intervention one year before five “‘late” CHCs. We measured monthly rates of patients with DM currently prescribed angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors/statins, if clinically indicated. Through segmented regression analysis, we evaluated the intervention’s effects in June 2011–May 2013. Participants included ~6500 adult CHC patients with DM who were indicated for statins/ACE-inhibitors per national guidelines. Results Implementation of the intervention in the CHCs was feasible, with setting-specific adaptations. One year post-implementation, in the early clinics, there were estimated relative increases in guideline-concordant prescribing of 37.6 % (95 % confidence interval (CI); 29.0–46.2 %) among patients indicated for both ACE-inhibitors and statins and 38.7 % (95 % CI; 23.2–54.2 %) among patients indicated for statins. No such increases were seen in the late (control) clinics in that period. Conclusions To our knowledge, this was the first clinical trial testing the translation and implementation of a successful QI initiative from a private, integrated care setting into CHCs. This proved feasible and had significant impact but required considerable adaptation and implementation support. These results suggest the feasibility of adapting diverse strategies developed in integrated care settings for implementation in under-resourced clinics, with important implications for efficiently improving care quality in such settings. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02299791 webcite.
机译:背景技术集成的医疗保健提供系统投入了大量资源来开发质量改进(QI)干预措施。为弱势人群服务的诊所很少有这种发展所需的资源,但可能会受益于实施在其他情况下有效的方法。很少有基于试验的研究评估社区卫生中心(CHC)中这种跨环境翻译和实施的可行性和影响。我们假设,从社区卫生服务中心的综合护理机构实施成功的QI干预措施将是可行的,并且会对社区卫生服务中心产生积极影响。方法我们采用了Kaiser Permanente的成功干预方法,该方法通过利益相关者驱动的迭代过程,针对糖尿病患者(DM)制定了基于指南的心脏保护处方。然后,我们以交错的方式在11个社区卫生中心进行了集群随机的实用性试验,其中六个“早期”社区卫生中心在五个“后期”社区卫生中心之前一年实施了干预。如果临床上有适应症,我们测量了目前已开具DM的血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂/他汀类药物患者的月率。通过分段回归分析,我们评估了该干预措施在2011年6月至2013年5月的效果。参与者包括约6500名成年的DM慢性CHC DM患者,根据国家指南,这些患者被指定使用他汀类/ ACE抑制剂。结果在社区卫生中心实施干预措施是可行的,可以根据具体情况进行调整。实施一年后,在早期临床中,ACEI抑制剂和他汀类药物的患者中指南一致处方的相对估计增加了37.6%(95%置信区间(CI); 29.0–46.2%),而38.7%接受他汀类药物治疗的患者中的%(95%CI; 23.2–54.2%)。在那个时期的后期(对照)诊所中没有看到这样的增加。结论据我们所知,这是第一个临床试验,用于测试成功的QI计划从私人,综合护理机构到CHC的翻译和实施。事实证明这是可行的,具有重大影响,但需要大量的适应和实施支持。这些结果表明,在资源贫乏的诊所中实施适应于综合护理环境中制定的各种策略的可行性,对于有效改善此类环境中的护理质量具有重要意义。 ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02299791网站。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号