首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >Involving patients in setting priorities for healthcare improvement: a cluster randomized trial
【24h】

Involving patients in setting priorities for healthcare improvement: a cluster randomized trial

机译:让患者参与确定医疗保健优先事项:一项整群随机试验

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Patients are increasingly seen as active partners in healthcare. While patient involvement in individual clinical decisions has been extensively studied, no trial has assessed how patients can effectively be involved in collective healthcare decisions affecting the population. The goal of this study was to test the impact of involving patients in setting healthcare improvement priorities for chronic care at the community level. Methods Design: Cluster randomized controlled trial. Local communities were randomized in intervention (priority setting with patient involvement) and control sites (no patient involvement). Setting: Communities in a canadian region were required to set priorities for improving chronic disease management in primary care, from a list of 37 validated quality indicators. Intervention: Patients were consulted in writing, before participating in face-to-face deliberation with professionals. Control: Professionals established priorities among themselves, without patient involvement. Participants: A total of 172 individuals from six communities participated in the study, including 83 chronic disease patients, and 89 health professionals. Outcomes: The primary outcome was the level of agreement between patients’ and professionals’ priorities. Secondary outcomes included professionals’ intention to use the selected quality indicators, and the costs of patient involvement. Results Priorities established with patients were more aligned with core generic components of the Medical Home and Chronic Care Model, including: access to primary care, self-care support, patient participation in clinical decisions, and partnership with community organizations (p?
机译:背景技术越来越多地将患者视为医疗保健的积极伙伴。尽管已经广泛研究了患者参与个体临床决策的过程,但尚无试验评估患者如何有效地参与影响人群的集体医疗决策。这项研究的目的是测试在社区层面上让患者参与制定慢性病医疗保健优先重点的影响。方法设计:整群随机对照试验。当地社区在干预(患者参与的优先级设置)和对照部位(无患者参与)中随机分组。设置:要求加拿大地区的社区从37个经过验证的质量指标列表中确定改善初级保健中慢性病管理的优先级。干预措施:在与专业人员进行面对面的讨论之前,先以书面形式咨询患者。控制:专业人员在没有患者参与的情况下确定了优先事项。参加者:来自六个社区的172名个人参加了研究,其中包括83名慢性病患者和89名卫生专业人员。结果:主要结果是患者和专业人员的优先事项之间达成一致的程度。次要结果包括专业人员使用所选质量指标的意愿以及患者参与的费用。结果与患者建立的优先顺序与“医疗家庭和慢性护理模型”的核心通用组成部分更加一致,包括:获得初级护理,自我护理支持,患者参与临床决策以及与社区组织的伙伴关系(p <0.01) )。仅由专业人员确定的优先事项就更加强调单一疾病管理的技术质量。参与干预促进了患者和专业人员之间的相互影响,导致共同优先事项的共识增加了41%(95%CI:+ 12%至+ 58%,p <0.01)。在干预和控制场所,专业人员使用所选质量指标的意图相似。患者的参与使确定优先次序的过程的成本增加了17%,并且需要10%以上的时间才能就共同的优先事项达成共识。结论患者的参与可以改变优先级,从而在总体上推动医疗保健的改善。未来的研究应该测试这些发现在其他情况下的普遍性,并评估其对患者护理的影响。试用注册荷兰国家试验注册号#NTR2496。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号