...
首页> 外文期刊>In vivo. >Ropivacaine versus Levobupivacaine for Minor Breast Surgery in Outpatients: Inversion of Postoperative Pain Relief Efficacy
【24h】

Ropivacaine versus Levobupivacaine for Minor Breast Surgery in Outpatients: Inversion of Postoperative Pain Relief Efficacy

机译:罗哌卡因与左旋布比卡因在门诊患者的小型乳房手术中的应用:术后疼痛缓解功效倒置

获取原文
           

摘要

The number of ambulatory surgical procedures is growing and local anesthesia represents the technique of choice for outpatients undergoing minor surgery. The aim of this study was to verify whether differences exist in postoperative pain relief using equipotent doses of two long-acting local anesthetics, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine, in patients who underwent minor breast surgery. A series of 86 consecutive women (median age=55, range=39-75 years) with small (<2 cm in size) breast masses requiring surgical excision were prospectively enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly selected to receive 7.5 mg/ml ropivacaine (group A, 42 patients) or 5 mg/ml levobupivacaine (group B, 44 patient). For post-surgical measurement of pain intensity a visual analog scale (VAS) was used. The age of the patients (56.4{+/-}9.6 vs. 56.7{+/-}9.5 years; p=0.88) and operative time (38.4{+/-}4.3 vs. 39.8{+/-}5.0 min; p=0.16), did not differ significantly between the groups (A vs. B). Transient adverse effects were observed in 5 (11.9%) and 4 (9.1%) patients (p=0.49) of groups A and B, respectively. The pain VAS four (t4) and 24 (t24) hours from the end of surgery was significantly (p<0.05) different between the groups, but an inversion of pain relief efficacy and a crossing point of the two pain-time lines at the sixth hour was observed. In conclusion, ropivacaine results in more effective pain relief at time t4, while levobupivacaine should be the drug of choice when long-term postoperative analgesia is required.
机译:门诊手术程序的数量正在增加,而局部麻醉是进行小型手术的门诊患者的首选技术。这项研究的目的是验证在进行小规模乳房手术的患者中,使用等剂量的两种长效局部麻醉药罗哌卡因和左旋布比卡因在术后缓解疼痛方面是否存在差异。前瞻性纳入了86例连续的女性(中位年龄为55岁,范围为39-75岁),乳房较小(<2 cm),需要手术切除。随机选择接受7.5 mg / ml罗哌卡因(A组,42名患者)或5 mg / ml左旋布比卡因(B组,44名患者)的患者。为了进行术后疼痛强度测量,使用了视觉模拟量表(VAS)。患者的年龄(56.4 {+/-} 9.6 vs. 56.7 {+/-} 9.5岁; p = 0.88)和手术时间(38.4 {+/-} 4.3 vs. 39.8 {+/-} 5.0 min; p = 0.16),两组之间无显着差异(A对B)。分别在A组和B组的5名患者(11.9%)和4名(9.1%)患者中观察到暂时性不良反应(p = 0.49)。两组患者在手术结束后四个(t4)和24(t24)小时的疼痛VAS差异显着(p <0.05),但止痛功效的倒置和两个疼痛时间线的交叉点观察了第六个小时。总之,罗哌卡因可在t4时更有效地缓解疼痛,而当需要长期术后镇痛时,左旋布比卡因应作为首选药物。

著录项

  • 来源
    《In vivo.》 |2012年第6期|共3页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类 肿瘤学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号