首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >Understanding practice: the factors that influence management of mild traumatic brain injury in the emergency department-a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework
【24h】

Understanding practice: the factors that influence management of mild traumatic brain injury in the emergency department-a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework

机译:理解实践:急诊科中轻度颅脑损伤管理的影响因素-使用理论域框架的定性研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Mild traumatic brain injury is a frequent cause of presentation to emergency departments. Despite the availability of clinical practice guidelines in this area, there is variation in practice. One of the aims of the Neurotrauma Evidence Translation program is to develop and evaluate a targeted, theory- and evidence-informed intervention to improve the management of mild traumatic brain injury in Australian emergency departments. This study is the first step in the intervention development process and uses the Theoretical Domains Framework to explore the factors perceived to influence the uptake of four key evidence-based recommended practices for managing mild traumatic brain injury. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with emergency staff in the Australian state of Victoria. The interview guide was developed using the Theoretical Domains Framework to explore current practice and to identify the factors perceived to influence practice. Two researchers coded the interview transcripts using thematic content analysis. Results A total of 42 participants (9 Directors, 20 doctors and 13 nurses) were interviewed over a seven-month period. The results suggested that (i) the prospective assessment of post-traumatic amnesia was influenced by: knowledge; beliefs about consequences; environmental context and resources; skills; social/professional role and identity; and beliefs about capabilities; (ii) the use of guideline-developed criteria or decision rules to inform the appropriate use of a CT scan was influenced by: knowledge; beliefs about consequences; environmental context and resources; memory, attention and decision processes; beliefs about capabilities; social influences; skills and behavioral regulation; (iii) providing verbal and written patient information on discharge was influenced by: beliefs about consequences; environmental context and resources; memory, attention and decision processes; social/professional role and identity; and knowledge; (iv) the practice of providing brief, routine follow-up on discharge was influenced by: environmental context and resources; social/professional role and identity; knowledge; beliefs about consequences; and motivation and goals. Conclusions Using the Theoretical Domains Framework, factors thought to influence the management of mild traumatic brain injury in the emergency department were identified. These factors present theoretically based targets for a future intervention.
机译:背景轻度的颅脑外伤是急诊科的常见原因。尽管可以在该领域获得临床实践指南,但实践中还是存在差异。 Neurotrauma证据翻译计划的目标之一是开发和评估有针对性的,理论和证据为依据的干预措施,以改善澳大利亚急诊科对轻度颅脑损伤的处理。这项研究是干预发展过程中的第一步,并使用“理论领域框架”来探讨影响轻度脑外伤的四种主要循证推荐做法的采用的影响因素。方法对澳大利亚维多利亚州的紧急人员进行了半结构化访谈。访谈指南是使用“理论领域框架”开发的,旨在探索当前的实践并确定影响实践的因素。两名研究人员使用主题内容分析对采访记录进行了编码。结果在七个月的时间内,共采访了42位参与者(9位主任,20位医生和13位护士)。结果表明:(i)对创伤后健忘症的前瞻性评估受到以下因素的影响:知识;对后果的信念;环境背景和资源;技能社会/专业角色和身份;关于能力的信念; (ii)使用指南制定的标准或决策规则来告知CT扫描的适当使用受到以下因素的影响:对后果的信念;环境背景和资源;记忆,注意力和决策过程;对能力的信念;社会影响力;技能和行为调节; (iii)提供有关出院的口头和书面患者信息受到以下因素的影响:对后果的信念;环境背景和资源;记忆,注意力和决策过程;社会/专业角色和身份;和知识; (iv)对排放情况进行简短,常规的后续行动的做法受到以下因素的影响:环境背景和资源;社会/专业角色和身份;知识;对后果的信念;和动机和目标。结论使用理论领域框架,确定了影响急诊科轻度颅脑损伤处理的因素。这些因素提出了未来干预的理论基础目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号