...
首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 4: how to assess coherence
【24h】

Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 4: how to assess coherence

机译:将GRADE-CERQual应用于定性证据综合发现—论文4:如何评估一致性

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundThe GRADE-CERQual (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach has been developed by the GRADE working group. The approach has been developed to support the use of findings from qualitative evidence syntheses in decision-making, including guideline development and policy formulation.CERQual includes four components for assessing how much confidence to place in findings from reviews of qualitative research (also referred to as qualitative evidence syntheses): (1) methodological limitations, (2) relevance, (3) coherence and (4) adequacy of data. This paper is part of a series providing guidance on how to apply CERQual and focuses on CERQual’s coherence component. MethodsWe developed the coherence component by searching the literature for definitions, gathering feedback from relevant research communities and developing consensus through project group meetings. We tested the CERQual coherence component within several qualitative evidence syntheses before agreeing on the current definition and principles for application. ResultsWhen applying CERQual, we define coherence as how clear and cogent the fit is between the data from the primary studies and a review finding that synthesises that data. In this paper, we describe the coherence component and its rationale and offer guidance on how to assess coherence in the context of a review finding as part of the CERQual approach. This guidance outlines the information required to assess coherence, the steps that need to be taken to assess coherence and examples of coherence assessments. ConclusionsThis paper provides guidance for review authors and others on undertaking an assessment of coherence in the context of the CERQual approach. We suggest that threats to coherence may arise when the data supporting a review finding are contradictory, ambiguous or incomplete or where competing theories exist that could be used to synthesise the data. We expect the CERQual approach, and its individual components, to develop further as our experiences with the practical implementation of the approach increase.
机译:背景技术GRADE工作组已开发出GRADE-CERQual(建议评估,发展和评估等级-质性研究回顾中的证据置信度)方法。该方法的开发旨在支持定性证据综合结果在决策中的使用,包括指南制定和政策制定.CERQual包括四个组成部分,用于评估对定性研究评论中发现的结果的置信度(也称为定性证据综合):( 1)方法学局限性,(2)相关性,(3)连贯性和(4)数据的充分性。本文是提供有关如何应用CERQual的指南的系列文章的一部分,并重点介绍了CERQual的一致性组件。方法我们通过搜索文献中的定义,收集相关研究社区的反馈以及通过项目小组会议达成共识来开发一致性组件。在就当前的应用定义和原则达成共识之前,我们通过几种定性证据综合测试了CERQual一致性组件。结果在应用CERQual时,我们将一致性定义为:主要研究数据与综合该数据的综述之间的拟合度有多清晰。在本文中,我们描述了连贯性组成部分及其基本原理,并就如何在CERQual评估方法的审查结果的背景下评估连贯性提供了指导。本指南概述了评估连贯性所需的信息,评估连贯性所需采取的步骤以及连贯性评估的示例。结论本文为审阅作者和其他人在CERQual方法的背景下进行一致性评估提供了指导。我们建议,当支持评论结论的数据相互矛盾,模棱两可或不完整时,或者存在可用于合成数据的竞争性理论时,可能会导致一致性的威胁。我们希望随着我们在该方法的实际实施方面的经验的增加,CERQual方法及其各个组成部分将进一步发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号