首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >The German Quality Network Sepsis: study protocol for the evaluation of a quality collaborative on decreasing sepsis-related mortality in a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences design
【24h】

The German Quality Network Sepsis: study protocol for the evaluation of a quality collaborative on decreasing sepsis-related mortality in a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences design

机译:德国质量网络脓毒症:研究协议,用于在准实验性差异差异设计中评估降低败血症相关死亡率的协作研究

获取原文
       

摘要

BackgroundWhile sepsis-related mortality decreased substantially in other developed countries, mortality of severe sepsis remained as high as 44% in Germany. A recent German cluster randomized trial was not able to improve guideline adherence and decrease sepsis-related mortality within the participating hospitals, partly based on lacking support by hospital management and lacking resources for documentation of prospective data. Thus, more pragmatic approaches are needed to improve quality of sepsis care in Germany. The primary objective of the study is to decrease sepsis-related hospital mortality within a quality collaborative relying on claims data. MethodThe German Quality Network Sepsis (GQNS) is a quality collaborative involving 75 hospitals. This study protocol describes the conduction and evaluation of the start-up period of the GQNS running from March 2016 to August 2018. Democratic structures assure participatory action, a study coordination bureau provides central support and resources, and local interdisciplinary quality improvement teams implement changes within the participating hospitals. Quarterly quality reports focusing on risk-adjusted hospital mortality in cases with sepsis based on claims data are provided. Hospitals committed to publish their individual risk-adjusted mortality compared to the German average. A complex risk-model is used to control for differences in patient-related risk factors. Hospitals are encouraged to implement a bundle of interventions, e.g., interdisciplinary case analyses, external peer-reviews, hospital-wide staff education, and implementation of rapid response teams. The effectiveness of the GQNS is evaluated in a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences design by comparing the change of hospital mortality of cases with sepsis with organ dysfunction from a retrospective baseline period (January 2014 to December 2015) and the intervention period (April 2016 to March 2018) between the participating hospitals and all other German hospitals. Structural and process quality indicators of sepsis care as well as efforts for quality improvement are monitored regularly. DiscussionThe GQNS is a large-scale quality collaborative using a pragmatic approach based on claims data. A complex risk-adjustment model allows valid quality comparisons between hospitals and with the German average. If this study finds the approach to be useful for improving quality of sepsis care, it may also be applied to other diseases. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02820675.
机译:背景虽然在其他发达国家,败血症相关的死亡率大大降低,但在德国严重脓毒症的死亡率仍高达44%。最近的一项德国集群随机试验未能改善参与医院内的指南依从性并降低败血症相关的死亡率,部分原因是缺乏医院管理部门的支持以及缺乏用于记录前瞻性数据的资源。因此,在德国需要更多实用的方法来改善败血症的护理质量。该研究的主要目的是在依靠索赔数据的高质量协作下降低败血症相关的医院死亡率。方法德国质量网络脓毒症(GQNS)是涉及75家医院的质量合作组织。该研究方案描述了从2016年3月到2018年8月的GQNS的启动阶段的进行和评估。民主机构确保参与行动,研究协调局提供中央支持和资源,地方跨学科质量改进团队在内部进行变更参与医院。提供了基于索赔数据的季度质量报告,重点关注败血症患者经风险调整后的医院死亡率。与德国平均水平相比,医院承诺公布其个人经风险调整后的死亡率。复杂的风险模型用于控制患者相关风险因素的差异。鼓励医院采取一系列干预措施,例如,跨学科病例分析,外部同行评审,医院范围内的员工教育以及快速反应团队的实施。通过比较回顾性基线期(2014年1月至2015年12月)和干预期(4月)的准实验性差异设计,通过比较脓毒症伴器官功能障碍患者的住院死亡率变化,评估了GQNS的有效性。 2016年至2018年3月)。脓毒症护理的结构和过程质量指标以及质量改进工作均受到定期监控。讨论GQNS是基于索赔数据的务实方法的大规模质量协作。复杂的风险调整模型可以在医院之间和德国平均值之间进行有效的质量比较。如果这项研究发现该方法对改善败血症护理质量有用,那么它也可以应用于其他疾病。试用注册ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02820675。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号