首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >Leading for the long haul: a mixed-method evaluation of the Sustainment Leadership Scale (SLS)
【24h】

Leading for the long haul: a mixed-method evaluation of the Sustainment Leadership Scale (SLS)

机译:引领长远发展:对可持续发展领导力量表(SLS)的综合评估

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundDespite our progress in understanding the organizational context for implementation and specifically the role of leadership in implementation, its role in sustainment has received little attention. This paper took a mixed-method approach to examine leadership during the sustainment phase of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework. Utilizing the Implementation Leadership Scale as a foundation, we sought to develop a short, practical measure of sustainment leadership that can be used for both applied and research purposes. MethodsData for this study were collected as a part of a larger mixed-method study of evidence-based intervention, SafeCare?, sustainment. Quantitative data were collected from 157 providers using web-based surveys. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the factor structure of the Sustainment Leadership Scale (SLS). Qualitative data were collected from 95 providers who participated in one of 15 focus groups. A framework approach guided qualitative data analysis. Mixed-method integration was also utilized to examine convergence of quantitative and qualitative findings. ResultsConfirmatory factor analysis supported the a priori higher order factor structure of the SLS with subscales indicating a single higher order sustainment leadership factor. The SLS demonstrated excellent internal consistency reliability. Qualitative analyses offered support for the dimensions of sustainment leadership captured by the quantitative measure, in addition to uncovering a fifth possible factor, available leadership. ConclusionsThis study found qualitative and quantitative support for the pragmatic SLS measure. The SLS can be used for assessing leadership of first-level leaders to understand how staff perceive leadership during sustainment and to suggest areas where leaders could direct more attention in order to increase the likelihood that EBIs are institutionalized into the normal functioning of the organization.
机译:背景尽管我们在理解实施的组织环境,尤其是领导在实施中的作用方面取得了进展,但其在维持方面的作用却很少受到关注。本文采用一种混合方法来研究在探索,准备,实施,维持(EPIS)框架的维持阶段的领导能力。我们以实施领导力量表为基础,力求开发一种简短,实用的可持续性领导量度,以用于应用和研究目的。方法本研究的数据是作为一项较大的基于证据的干预措施,SafeCare ?、维持性混合方法研究的一部分而收集的。使用基于网络的调查从157个提供商那里收集了定量数据。验证性因素分析用于检验可持续领导力量表(SLS)的因素结构。定性数据是从参与15个焦点小组之一的95个提供者那里收集的。框架方法指导了定性数据分析。混合方法集成还用于检查定量和定性结果的融合。结果证实性因子分析支持SLS的先验高阶因子结构,其子量表表明单个高阶维持领导因子。 SLS具有出色的内部一致性可靠性。定性分析除了揭示了第五个可能的因素,即可用的领导力外,还为定量测量所捕获的可持续性领导力的维度提供了支持。结论本研究为务实的SLS措施提供了定性和定量支持。 SLS可用于评估一级领导者的领导力,以了解员工在维持过程中如何看待领导力,并建议领导者可以指导更多关注的领域,以增加将EBIs制度化为组织正常运作的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号