...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian heart journal >A comparative study of clinical profile and outcomes of patients with ischemic and non-ischemic complete heart block
【24h】

A comparative study of clinical profile and outcomes of patients with ischemic and non-ischemic complete heart block

机译:缺血性和非缺血性完全性心脏传导阻滞患者的临床资料和预后的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Complete heart block (CHB) is a medical emergencyand usually requires immediate intervention. Both cardiacischemia and non-ischemic conditions can cause CHB. The aim ofthis study is to compare baseline clinical characteristics associatedwith ischemic versus non-ischemic causes of CHB and theiroutcomes.Materials and Methods: This is a single center retrospective,observational study. Consecutive 250 patients with CHB fromJanuary to December 2016 were included. Patients were characterizedinto non-ischemic and ischemic groups based on cardiacmarker elevation, ECG changes and/or cardiac catheterization findings.The primary outcome was all-cause mortality and secondaryoutcome was pacemaker placement.Results: Out of 250 patients, 137 had ischemic and 113 hadnon-ischemic CHB. The mean age was 60.5 yrs in ischemic groupand 61.32 yrs in the non-ischemic group (p = 0.58). Patients withischemic CHB had a lower mean ejection fraction (EF) [44.2% vs55.2%, (p < 0.01)]. In the ischemic group, 55 patients (40%) presentedwith cardiogenic shock compared to 6 (0.07%) in the non-ischemicgroup (p < 0.001). Statistically significant difference was presentbetween ischemic and non-ischemic groups in diabetes mellitus(DM) (56.9% vs 45%, p = 0.006), dyslipidemia (13.1% vs 0.5%,p = 0.001) and smoking (31.3% vs 14.1%, p < 0.001). In the ischemicgroup, 112 patients had inferior wall myocardial infarction (IWMI)(81.7%) and 21 had anterior wall myocardial infarction (AWMI)(15.3%). Right coronary artery (RCA) was the most common culpritvessel (73%). Seventy patients underwent percutaneous coronaryintervention (PCI) and 10 were referred for coronary artery bypassgrafting (CABG). For outcomes, 8 out of 113 (0.07%)patients withnon-ischemic CHB died compared to 33 out of 137 (24.1%) ischemicCHB (p < 0.001). Permanent pacemaker was implanted in 76 out of113 patients (67.2%) in the non-ischemic group compared to 14 outof 137 (10.2%) in the ischemic group (p < 0.001).Conclusion: Patients with ischemic CHB have a lower EF withhigher mortality. Risk factors like diabetes mellitus (DM), dyslipidemiaand smoking are more frequent in the ischemic group andthey are less likely to get a permanent pacemaker compared tonon-ischemic CHB.
机译:背景:完全性心脏传导阻滞(CHB)是一种医疗急症,通常需要立即进行干预。心脏缺血和非缺血状态均可导致CHB。这项研究的目的是比较与CHB的缺血性和非缺血性原因及其结果相关的基线临床特征。材料与方法:这是一项单中心回顾性观察研究。纳入2016年1月至2016年12月连续250例CHB患者。根据心脏标志物升高,心电图改变和/或心脏导管检查结果将患者分为非缺血和缺血组,主要结果是全因死亡率,继发结果是起搏器放置。结果:250例患者中有137例缺血性和113例非缺血性-缺血性CHB。缺血组的平均年龄为60.5岁,非缺血组的平均年龄为61.32岁(p = 0.58)。缺血性CHB患者的平均射血分数(EF)较低[44.2%vs55.2%,(p <0.01)]。在缺血组中,有55例(40%)发生心源性休克,而在非缺血组中有6例(0.07%)(p <0.001)。糖尿病(DM)缺血组和非缺血组之间有统计学差异(56.9%vs 45%,p = 0.006),血脂异常(13.1%vs 0.5%,p = 0.001)和吸烟(31.3%vs 14.1%, p <0.001)。在缺血组中,下壁心肌梗死(IWMI)112例(81.7%),前壁心肌梗塞(AWMI)21例(15.3%)。右冠状动脉(RCA)是最常见的罪魁祸首(73%)。 70例患者接受了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI),其中10例接受了冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)。对于结局,非缺血性CHB患者中113例(0.07%)中有8例死亡,而137例缺血性CHB患者中有33例(24.1%)死亡(p <0.001)。非缺血组113例患者中有76例(67.2%)植入了永久起搏器,而缺血组137例中有14例(10.2%)植入了永久起搏器(p <0.001)。结论:缺血性CHB患者的EF较低,死亡率更高。与非缺血性CHB相比,缺血性组中糖尿病(DM),血脂异常和吸烟等危险因素更为常见,并且他们获得永久起搏器的可能性较小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号