首页> 外文期刊>IMC Journal of Medical Science >Safety and feasibility of subarachnoid block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
【24h】

Safety and feasibility of subarachnoid block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

机译:蛛网膜下腔阻滞在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的安全性和可行性

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and objectives : Laparoscopic surgery is normally performed under general anesthesia (GA), but regional techniques like epidural or subarachnoid block (SAB) have been found beneficial in patients having associated major medical problems. In selected cases, it can be a safe alternative to GA. Hence, the present study was conducted to explore the safety and feasibility of SAB in otherwise healthy individuals undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods : Forty patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy and fulfilling specific inclusion criteria were included in the study. All patients received a segmental (L2-L3 injection) SAB with 3 ml (0.5%) of bupivacaine and 25 microgram of fentanyl. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was done by standard 4 port technique. Intra-abdominal pressure was kept low at 9-10 mm Hg using COsub2/sub pneumoperitoneum. Patients were followed up at 30 minutes, 4 hours, at the time of discharge and on day 7 after operation. Any unwanted voluntary or involuntary movement or exaggerated diaphragmatic excursion during the operation was monitored. Operation time, operating room (OR) occupancy time, hospital stay, post-operative pain, analgesic requirement, nausea, vomiting, headache, right shoulder pain, wound-related complications and patient satisfaction were recorded. Results : SAB was effective for surgery in all 40 patients. Two patients required conversion to general anesthesia for persisting low oxygen saturation. Hypotension was recorded in 23.7% patients while 10.5% experienced right shoulder pain. Average operating time was 37.3 minutes (21 - 77 minutes). Awkward movement and exaggerated respiratory excursion was noted in 23.7% and 18.4% cases respectively. Only two cases had to undergo (conversion to) GA. Mean period of hospital stay was 29.3 hours. No incidence of any major complication occurred. Conclusion : This study showed that SAB could be used successfully and effectively for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in healthy patients and may be a safe alternative to GA.
机译:背景与目的:腹腔镜手术通常在全身麻醉(GA)下进行,但已发现诸如硬膜外或蛛网膜下腔阻滞(SAB)之类的区域技术对伴有重大医疗问题的患者有益。在某些情况下,它可以替代GA。因此,本研究旨在探讨SAB在进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的其他健康人群中的安全性和可行性。方法:40例行择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术且符合特定入选标准的患者被纳入研究。所有患者均接受分段(L2-L3注射)SAB,其中含3 ml(0.5%)布比卡因和25微克芬太尼。腹腔镜胆囊切除术是通过标准的4端口技术完成的。使用CO 2 气腹将腹腔内压力保持在9-10 mm Hg。在出院时和手术后第7天对患者进行30分钟,4小时的随访。监测手术过程中的任何不希望的自愿或非自愿运动或夸张的diaphragm肌偏移。记录手术时间,手术室(OR)占用时间,住院时间,术后疼痛,镇痛要求,恶心,呕吐,头痛,右肩痛,伤口相关并发症和患者满意度。结果:SAB在所有40例患者中均有效。由于持续的低氧饱和度,两名患者需要转为全身麻醉。在23.7%的患者中记录了低血压,而10.5%的患者则经历了右肩痛。平均操作时间为37.3分钟(21-77分钟)。分别在23.7%和18.4%的病例中发现了笨拙的运动和过度的呼吸偏移。只有两个案例必须接受(转换为)GA。平均住院时间为29.3小时。没有发生任何重大并发症的发生。结论:这项研究表明,SAB可以成功,有效地用于健康患者的腹腔镜胆囊切除术,并且可能是一种安全的替代GA的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号