...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprology >Oral sex related knowledge and oral sex behavior among homosexual and heterosexual men in Belgrade: A cross-sectional study
【24h】

Oral sex related knowledge and oral sex behavior among homosexual and heterosexual men in Belgrade: A cross-sectional study

机译:贝尔格莱德同性和异性恋男人的口交相关知识和口交行为:一项横断面研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Although the risk of sexually transmitted infections is far greater during vaginal and anal sex than during oral sex, increasing practice of oral sex and low rates of barrier method use will probably increase the relative importance of oral sex as a route of transmission for genital pathogens. Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate knowledge and attitudes about oral sex and sexually transmitted infections, as well as oral sex practices, both among heterosexuals and homosexual men and to compare those two groups. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, data were collected from consecutive sexually active male patients who ever had oral sex and who attended counselling for sexually transmitted infections at the City Institute for Skin and Venereal Diseases in Belgrade from March to June 2016. One dermatologist interviewed all participants. Results: The study included 359 men who ever had oral sex, 95 (26.5%) homosexual and 264 (73.5%) heterosexual men. In comparison with heterosexual men, homosexual men had considerably more lifetime sexual partners and oral sex partners during the past 3 months, and significantly more frequently practiced oral-anal sex. Oral-sex related knowledge of all participants was unsatisfactory [correct answers were given by 95 (26.5%) to 277 (77.2%) participants], but it was significantly better in homosexual men than in heterosexual. Frequency of condom use and human immunodeficiency virus testing was also significantly higher in the case of homosexual than heterosexual men. Limitations: The study was not performed in representative sample of population. It was restricted to the patients. Consequently it is questionable whether the results obtained could be generalized. Conclusion: Oral sex related knowledge deficits and risky oral sex practice exist in both homosexual and heterosexual men. These findings indicate a need for effective public health campaign and patient education about the risks of unprotected oral sex.
机译:背景:尽管在阴道和肛门性行为中发生性传播感染的风险要比在口交过程中高得多,但增加性行为的实践和低隔离方法的使用率可能会增加口性作为生殖器传播途径的相对重要性。病原体。目的:本研究的目的是评估异性恋者和同性恋者之间关于口交和性传播感染以及口交行为的知识和态度,并比较两组。资料和方法:在这项横断面研究中,数据收集自2016年3月至2016年6月在贝尔格莱德市皮肤与性病研究所接受连续性交,口交且参加过性传播感染咨询的男性患者。一位皮肤科医生采访了所有参与者。结果:该研究包括359名曾经做过口交的男人,95名(26.5%)同性恋和264(73.5%)个异性恋男人。与异性恋男人相比,在过去的三个月中,同性恋男人有更多的终生性伴侣和口交伴侣,并且显着更频繁地进行口交。所有参与者的与口交有关的知识都不尽人意[95位参与者(26.5%)至277位(77.2%)参与者给出了正确答案],但同性恋男性比异性恋女性要好得多。同性恋者使用安全套和进行人体免疫机能丧失病毒检测的频率也明显高于异性恋男人。局限性:该研究未在代表性人群中进行。它仅限于患者。因此,所获得的结果是否可以一概而论。结论:同性恋和异性恋男性均存在与性相关的知识缺陷和危险的性行为实践。这些发现表明,需要开展有效的公共卫生运动,并对患者进行有关无保护的口交风险的教育。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号