首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Dental Research >Marginal microleakage of glass ionomer cement with two different cavity conditioners on primary anterior teeth – An in vitro study
【24h】

Marginal microleakage of glass ionomer cement with two different cavity conditioners on primary anterior teeth – An in vitro study

机译:两种前牙调节剂对玻璃离子水门汀的边缘微渗漏的体外研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background and Objective: Glass ionomer cements (GICs) are the most commonly used restorative material in pediatric dentistry. They have numerous advantages; however, they show some marginal microleakage at the restoration–tooth interface. Various conditioning agents have been tested for alteration or dissolution of smear layer which has been attributed to the occurrence of microleakage; however, very limited studies have been done using primary teeth. Aims: To evaluate and compare the effect of 10% polyacrylic acid and 17% EDTA on marginal microleakage of high-viscosity GIC. Settings and Design: Experimental, in vitro study. Methodology: Class V cavities of standardized dimensions were prepared on 60 primary anterior teeth and were randomly divided into three groups. Except Group I, the cavities of Groups II and III were conditioned with 10% polyacrylic acid and 17% EDTA, respectively. All the 60 teeth were then restored with high-viscosity GIC. The samples were thermocycled and immersed in methylene blue solution for 24 h. The teeth were removed from the stain, rinsed, and sectioned buccolingually and were observed under stereomicroscope at 30× to score the marginal microleakage. Statistical Analysis Used: Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Mann–Whitney post hoc analysis were used to compare the mean marginal leakage scores between the three study groups. Results: Statistical significance difference was found between all the three groups (P 0.05). The mean marginal microleakage score was maximum for Group I (control group; 3.00), whereas it was the least for Group II (1.30) where 10% polyacrylic was used for conditioning the cavity surface. Conclusion: Among the study groups, none of them was completely devoid of microleakage in all its samples. 10% polyacrylic acid emerged as a better conditioning agent when compared with 17% EDTA in altering or removing the smear layer thereby resulting in better adhesion.
机译:背景与目的:玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)是儿科牙科中最常用的修复材料。它们具有许多优点。但是,它们在修复体-牙齿界面处显示出一些微渗漏。已经测试了各种调理剂的涂片层的改变或溶解,这归因于微渗漏的发生。然而,使用乳齿的研究非常有限。目的:评价和比较10%聚丙烯酸和17%EDTA对高粘度GIC的微渗漏的影响。设置和设计:实验,体外研究。方法:在60颗前牙上准备了标准尺寸的V级腔,并随机分为三组。除第一组外,第二组和第三组的空腔分别用10%的聚丙烯酸和17%的EDTA调节。然后用高粘度GIC修复所有60颗牙齿。将样品热循环并浸入亚甲基蓝溶液中24小时。将牙齿从污渍中移出,冲洗,然后颊齿切片,并在立体显微镜下以30倍观察观察以记录边缘微渗漏。使用的统计分析:使用Kruskal-Wallis检验,再进行Mann-Whitney事后分析,比较三个研究组之间的平均边缘渗漏分数。结果:三组间差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。 I组(对照组; 3.00)的平均边缘微渗漏评分最高,而II组(1.30)的平均边缘微渗漏评分最低,其中10%的聚丙烯酸用于调节型腔表面。结论:在研究组中,没有一个人的所有样本都完全没有微渗漏。与17%EDTA相比,10%聚丙烯酸在改变或去除涂片层方面表现出更好的调理效果,因此具有更好的附着力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号