...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Dental Research >Comparative evaluation of stresses in tooth implant connected fixed partial denture by varying the implant design and position: A 3D finite element study
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of stresses in tooth implant connected fixed partial denture by varying the implant design and position: A 3D finite element study

机译:通过更改种植体的设计和位置,比较连接固定局部义齿的牙齿种植体中应力的评估:3D有限元研究

获取原文

摘要

Aim: This study aims at evaluating stresses generated in a fixed tooth to implant connected fixed partial denture (FPD) by finite element method by varying implant design and position, in unilateral distal extension cases, i.e. for replacing mandibular 1 st and 2 nd molars. Materials and Methods: Four models were created, Model 1-A finite element model (FEA) model of a crestal implant-tooth connected metal ceramic FPD with pontic in 36 region. The 35 region simulated the second premolar. Model 2-A FEA model of a basal implant-tooth connected metal ceramic FPD. Model 3-A FEA model of a crestal implant in 36 region connected to tooth 35 and cantilevered posteriorly with pontic in 37 region, made of metal ceramic. Model 4-A FEA model of a basal implant in 36 region connected to tooth 35 and cantilevered posteriorly with pontic in 37 region, made of metal ceramic. A vertical force of 100N directed evenly on the nodes on the occlusal surface of each of the three crowns. The models displayed stress both numerically and by color coding. Results: On comparing models 1 and 2, the model 1 showed comparatively more stresses in crestal bone area of the implant. On comparing models 3 and 4, model 3 showed lesser von misses stress values. Conclusion: In case of tooth implant connected FPDs without any cantilevers, basal implants show better stress distribution when compared to crestal implants. In case of cantilever designs, crestal implant design showed lower stress values, but the difference in stresses were less.
机译:目的:本研究旨在通过改变种植体的设计和位置,通过有限元方法评估固定齿对固定连接的局部义齿(FPD)的固定牙产生的应力,例如单侧远侧扩展情况,即替换下颌1 st 和2个 nd 臼齿。材料和方法:创建了四个模型,其中一个在36个区域中具有牙桥的牙种植体-牙齿连接金属陶瓷FPD的模型1-A有限元模型(FEA)模型。 35个区域模拟了第二个前磨牙。种植牙连接的金属陶瓷FPD的2-A FEA模型。模型3-A FEA模型由金属陶瓷制成,在36个区域连接到牙齿35,并向后悬垂,并在37个区域带有桥体的牙托植入物。模型4-A FEA模型由金属陶瓷制成,位于36个区域,与牙齿35相连,并向后悬垂,并在37个区域带有桥体的基础种植体。 100N的垂直力均匀地指向三个牙冠中每个牙冠的咬合面上的节点。这些模型通过数字和颜色编码显示应力。结果:在比较模型1和2时,模型1在植入物的牙槽骨区域显示出相对更大的应力。在比较模型3和模型4时,模型3显示较少的von miss应力值。结论:如果牙种植体连接的FPD没有任何悬臂,则与牙种植体相比,基础种植体显示出更好的应力分布。在悬臂设计的情况下,顶托植入物设计显示出较低的应力值,但应力差异较小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号