首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Community Medicine >Comparison of Performance of Digital Hemoglobinometer over Automated Hematology Analyzer for Hemoglobin Estimation and Its user-friendliness among the Pregnant Women in Selected District Hospitals of Madhya Pradesh
【24h】

Comparison of Performance of Digital Hemoglobinometer over Automated Hematology Analyzer for Hemoglobin Estimation and Its user-friendliness among the Pregnant Women in Selected District Hospitals of Madhya Pradesh

机译:中央邦某些地区医院的孕妇使用数字血红蛋白仪在自动血细胞分析仪上进行血红蛋白估计及其用户友好性的性能比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Context: There is a need for a simple screening method for the detection of anemia that can be used by public health workers in the field. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare two methods for hemoglobin estimation, i.e., automated hematology analyzer and Digital Hemoglobinometer, and to find out the sensitivity and specificity of Digital Hemoglobinometer for the estimation of hemoglobin. Subjects and Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was carried out for 6 months from April to September 2017 in a District Hospital of five High Priority Districts of Madhya Pradesh. Two hundred and sixty antenatal females per district were selected for the study. Results: The mean hemoglobin by autoanalyzer is 10.19, and that by Digital Hemoglobinometer device is 9.89. Overall, sensitivity of Digital Hemoglobinometer for hemoglobin estimation was calculated to be 89.4% and specificity was calculated to be 63.6%. Positive predictive value was found to be 82.6% and negative predictive value was 75.8% compared against AutoAnalyser (gold standard). Conclusions: As the Digital Hemoglobinometer device has high sensitivity and specificity and good diagnostic accuracy, it must be used at the community level in resource-poor setting for hemoglobin estimation. In primary health-care conditions, Digital Hemoglobinometer can significantly reduce misdiagnosis of anemia compared with clinical assessment alone.
机译:背景:需要一种简单的筛查贫血的筛查方法,以供现场的公共卫生工作者使用。目的:本研究的目的是比较自动血液分析仪和数字血红蛋白仪的两种评估血红蛋白的方法,并找出数字血红蛋白仪用于评估血红蛋白的敏感性和特异性。受试者与方法:2017年4月至2017年9月,在中央邦五个高度优先地区的地区医院进行了为期6个月的基于医院的横断面研究。选择每个地区的260名产前女性进行研究。结果:自动分析仪的平均血红蛋白为10.19,数字血红蛋白仪的平均血红蛋白为9.89。总体而言,数字血红蛋白仪对血红蛋白估计的敏感性经计算为89.4%,特异性经计算为63.6%。与AutoAnalyser(金标准)相比,发现阳性预测值为82.6%,阴性预测值为75.8%。结论:由于数字血红蛋白仪设备具有很高的灵敏度和特异性以及良好的诊断准确性,因此在资源贫乏地区必须在社区一级用于血红蛋白估计。在初级保健条件下,与单独进行临床评估相比,数字血红蛋白仪可以显着减少对贫血的误诊。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号