首页> 外文期刊>Avian Conservation and Ecology >Influence of call broadcast timing within point counts and survey duration on detection probability of marsh breeding birds
【24h】

Influence of call broadcast timing within point counts and survey duration on detection probability of marsh breeding birds

机译:点数和调查持续时间内的呼叫广播时间对沼泽种鸟检测概率的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

The Standardized North American Marsh Bird Monitoring Protocol recommends point counts consisting of a 5-min passive observation period, meant to be free of broadcast bias, followed by call broadcasts to entice elusive species to reveal their presence. Prior to this protocol, some monitoring programs used point counts with broadcasts during the first 5 min of 10-min counts, and have since used 15-min counts with an initial 5-min passive period (P1) followed by 5 min of broadcasts (B) and a second 5-min passive period (P2) to ensure consistency across years and programs. Influence of timing of broadcasts within point counts and point count duration, however, have rarely been assessed. Using data from 23,973 broadcast-assisted 15-min point counts conducted throughout the Great Lakes–St. Lawrence region between 2008 and 2016 by Bird Studies Canada’s Marsh Monitoring Program and Central Michigan University’s Great Lakes Coastal Wetland Monitoring Program, we estimated detection probabilities of individuals for 14 marsh breeding bird species during P1B compared to BP2, P1 compared to P2, and P1B compared to P1BP2. For six broadcast species and American Bittern (Botaurus lentiginosus), we found no significant difference in detection during P1B compared to BP2, and no significant difference in four of the same seven species during P1 compared to P2. We observed small but significant differences in detection for 7 of 14 species during P1B compared to P1BP2. We conclude that differences in timing of broadcasts causes no bias based on counts from entire 10-minute surveys, although P1B should be favored over BP2 because the same amount of effort in P1B avoids broadcast bias in all broadcast species, and 10-min surveys are superior to 15-min surveys because modest gains in detection of some species does not warrant the additional effort. We recommend point counts consisting of 5 min of passive observation followed by broadcasts, consistent with the standardized marsh bird protocol, for surveying marsh breeding birds.
机译:标准化北美沼泽鸟类监测协议建议点计数包括5分钟的被动观察期,这意味着没有广播偏差,然后进行广播以诱使难以捉摸的物种揭示它们的存在。在此协议之前,某些监视程序在10分钟计数的前5分钟内将点数与广播一起使用,并且此后在最初5分钟的被动周期(P1)中使用15分钟计数,随后进行5分钟的广播( B)和第二个5分钟的被动期(P2),以确保跨年度和跨计划的一致性。但是,很少评估广播定时在点数和点数持续时间内的影响。利用从23,973个广播辅助15分钟点计数中获得的数据,整个大湖区-圣约翰根据加拿大鸟类研究的沼泽监测计划和中央密歇根大学的大湖沿岸湿地监测计划,在2008年至2016年之间的劳伦斯地区,我们估计了P1B与BP2,P1与P2和P1B相比,个体对14种沼泽繁殖鸟类的检测概率。至P1BP2。对于六个广播物种和美洲Bit(Botaurus lentiginosus),我们发现在P1B期间与BP2相比检测没有显着差异,在P1期间与P2相比,相同的七个物种中的四个也没有显着差异。我们观察到与P1BP2相比,在P1B期间对14种中的7种进行检测时存在微小但显着的差异。我们得出结论,基于整个10分钟调查的计数,广播时间上的差异不会导致偏差,尽管P1B比BP2更受青睐,因为P1B中的相同工作量可以避免所有广播种类的广播偏差,因此10分钟调查是优于15分钟的调查,因为在检测某些物种方面的适度收益并不能保证您会付出额外的努力。我们建议点计数由5分钟的被动观察和随后的广播组成,这与标准的沼泽鸟协议相一致,以用于调查沼泽繁殖鸟。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号