Gleason grading of prostate cancer in needle core biopsies: a comparison of general and urologic pathologists

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Gleason grading of prostate carcinoma (PCa) in needle core biopsies is a major determinant used in management planning. The objective of this study was to evaluate the concordance between general pathologists Gleason grading and that of a urologic pathologist in our community. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective review conducted at three tertiary care hospitals in Jeddah and Riyadh for all prostatic biopsies with carcinoma from January 2002 to January 2011. METHODS: Gleason scores assigned by the original pathologist were compared with that of the reviewing urologic pathologists. Biopsies were originally obtained and diagnosed at different referring hospitals and independent laboratories. The kappa test was used to evaluate agreement between the original and review scores. RESULTS: For 212 biopsies the exact concordance of the Gleason score assigned by the original pathologist and the reviewer was 38.7% (82/212). However, when grouped into the main four-score categories of 2-4, 5-6, 7, and 8 or greater, disagreement was noted in 88 (41.5%) biopsies; 87 were upgraded and 1 was downgraded on?review. When grouped into two-score categories of low grade (≤6) and high grade (≥7), disagreement was noted?in 32 (15%) of the biopsies. CONCLUSION: Gleason grade score shows that there was only slight to fair agreement between outside and?review scoring (kappa=0.43). When using only low versus high grade categorization, there was good agreement?(kappa=0.69). Almost all of the cases with score disagreement were upgraded on review.