首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Saudi medicine. >Perceived stress and coping strategies among ICU nurses in government tertiary hospitals in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study
【24h】

Perceived stress and coping strategies among ICU nurses in government tertiary hospitals in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study

机译:横断面研究:沙特阿拉伯政府三级医院ICU护士的感知压力和应对策略

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: No study has examined the stress level and coping strategies among critical care nurses in Saudi Arabia.OBJECTIVES: Examine perceived stress and coping behaviors among nurses in intensive care units in Saudi Arabia, and the influence of coping mechanisms on stress.DESIGN: Descriptive cross-sectional.SETTING: Two tertiary training hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Nurses from cardiac, surgery and pediatric intensive care units responded to an online survey. Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10) and the Brief COPE Inventory were used as primary research tools. Multivariate methods were used to analyze the data.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Stress levels, coping strategies, and associated factors.SAMPLE SIZE: 154 nurses.RESULTS: The majority of the respondents reported a moderate level of stress in the past month (87.0%). Mean (SD) scores for nurses working in the cardiac ICU indicated significantly higher levels of stress compared to surgical ICU (18.18 [3.88] vs 6.17 [3.21], P=.025). Belief in religion was the most common coping behavior while the use of substances was the lowest (mean scores [SD] 6.70 [1.72] vs 2.22 [0.81]). In the multivariate analysis, behavioral disengagement (P=.016) and self-blame (P.001) intensified the PSS-10 score, whereas acceptance (P=.048) reduced the PSS-10 score.CONCLUSION: The additional knowledge that behavioral disengagement and blaming aggravate stress can serve as the basis in formulating work-related stress reduction strategies among nurses caring for critical patients.LIMITATIONS: The use of self-reports, convenience sampling, and selected demographic factors may have limited the scope and generalizability of the findings and induced social desirability bias.CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.
机译:背景:目前尚无研究对沙特阿拉伯重症监护护士的压力水平和应对策略进行研究。目的:检查沙特阿拉伯重症监护室护士的感知压力和应对行为,以及应对机制对压力的影响。设计:描述性地点:沙特阿拉伯利雅得的两家三级培训医院。研究对象和方法:来自心脏,外科和儿科重症监护室的护士对在线调查做出了回应。感知压力量表10(PSS-10)和COPE简要清单用作主要研究工具。主要观察指标:压力水平,应对策略及相关因素样本量:154名护士结果:大多数受访者在过去一个月中报告了中等水平的压力(87.0%) 。与外科重症监护室相比,在心脏重症监护室工作的护士的平均(SD)评分表明压力水平明显更高(18.18 [3.88]对6.17 [3.21],P = .025)。信仰是最常见的应对行为,而使用物质的行为最低(平均得分[SD] 6.70 [1.72] vs 2.22 [0.81])。在多变量分析中,行为疏离(P = .016)和自责(P <.001)加剧了PSS-10得分,而接受(P = .048)降低了PSS-10得分。结论:额外的知识行为疏离和指责加重压力可以作为在照顾重症患者的护士中制定与工作相关的压力减轻策略的基础。局限性:自我报告,便利性抽样和选定的人口统计学因素的使用可能会限制范围和推广性的发现和诱发的社会可取性偏见。利益冲突:无。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号