首页> 外文期刊>Arquivos de Gastroenterologia >Sangue oculto nas fezes: uma compara??o entre os métodos químico e imunoquímico
【24h】

Sangue oculto nas fezes: uma compara??o entre os métodos químico e imunoquímico

机译:便血:化学和免疫化学方法的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: Colorectal bleeding is a warning sign that may be identified by fecal occult blood testing. A positive fecal occult blood test result requires a subsequent colonoscopy, a costly and invasive examination. Therefore, the use of diagnostic tests with optimal sensitivity and specificity is warranted. In this study, we evaluated four different fecal occult blood tests in 176 patients undergoing colonoscopy and compared their results. OBJECTIVE: To assess the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of chemical and immunochemical fecal occult blood tests in patients undergoing colonoscopy and to evaluate the degree of concordance between the tests and colonoscopy. METHODS: Patients with indications for colonoscopy also underwent fecal occult blood testing by chemical (toluidine test) and immunochemical methods, employing three commercially available kits. Based on the endoscopic findings, the colonoscopy was rated as positive or negative for colorectal bleeding. The degree of concordance between the fecal occult blood tests and the colonoscopy was evaluated by the kappa index. RESULTS: Forty-four (25%) colonoscopies were categorized as positive for colorectal bleeding. The toluidine test presented lower concordance than the immunochemical tests, which showed moderate concordance with the colonoscopy. The toluidine test had the least sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. CONCLUSION: The immunochemical fecal occult blood tests showed greater sensitivity, specificity and predictive values in detecting colorectal bleeding. The immunochemical tests had superior indexes of agreement with colonoscopy compared to the toluidine test.
机译:背景:大肠出血是一个警告信号,可以通过粪便潜血测试来识别。粪便潜血测试结果阳性需要随后的结肠镜检查,昂贵且侵入性的检查。因此,必须使用具有最佳灵敏度和特异性的诊断测试。在这项研究中,我们评估了176例接受结肠镜检查的患者的四种不同的粪便潜血测试,并比较了他们的结果。目的:评估结肠镜检查患者化学和免疫化学粪便潜血试验的敏感性,特异性和预测价值,并评估试验与结肠镜检查之间的一致性程度。方法:使用三种市售试剂盒,通过化学(甲苯胺试验)和免疫化学方法对有结肠镜检查指征的患者也进行了粪便潜血试验。根据内窥镜检查结果,结肠镜检查被认为是大肠出血的阳性或阴性。粪便潜血试验和结肠镜检查之间的一致性程度由κ指数评估。结果:四十四(25%)结肠镜检查被分类为大肠出血阳性。甲苯胺试验的一致性低于免疫化学试验,后者与结肠镜检查呈中等一致性。甲苯胺测试的灵敏度,特异性和阳性和阴性预测值最低。结论:粪便隐血免疫化学检测在检测大肠出血方面具有更高的敏感性,特异性和预测价值。与甲苯胺测试相比,免疫化学测试与结肠镜检查的一致性指标更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号