首页> 外文期刊>Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia >Measurements of anterior chamber depth, white-to-white distance, anterior chamber angle, and pupil diameter using two Scheimpflug imaging devices
【24h】

Measurements of anterior chamber depth, white-to-white distance, anterior chamber angle, and pupil diameter using two Scheimpflug imaging devices

机译:使用两个Scheimpflug成像设备测量前房深度,白距离,前房角和瞳孔直径

获取原文
       

摘要

Purpose: To compare the ocular anterior chamber depth, white-to-white distance, anterior chamber angle, and pupil diameter, as measured with two different Scheimpflug imaging devices. Methods: This transversal study included 80 right eyes from 80 subjects aged from 20 to 40 years. Their spherical equivalents ranged from -4.25 to +1.00 diopters (D). Each eye's anterior chamber depth, white-to-white distance, anterior chamber angle, and pupil diameter, were measured for far vision using both the Galilei G4 (double Scheimpflug camera) and the Pentacam HR (single Scheimpflug camera) systems. Results: Mean anterior chamber depths were calculated as 3.12 ± 0.23 mm and 3.19 ± 0.24 mm when measured with the Galilei G4 and the Pentacam HR, respectively. The mean white-to-white distance measured was 11.84 ± 0.31 mm and 11.90 ± 0.43 mm when measured with the Galilei G4 and the Pentacam HR, respectively. Mean pupil diameters were measured as 3.22 ± 0.58 mm and 3.22 ± 0.52 mm when measured with the Galilei G4 and the Pentacam HR, respectively. Finally, the mean anterior chamber angle was 34.30 ± 2.86 degrees when it was measured with the Galilei G4, and 39.26 ± 2.85 degrees when measured with the Pentacam HR. A comparative analysis revealed that the Galilei G4 yielded a significantly lower (P0.05) measurement for the anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber angle, and pupil diameter, than the Pentacam HR system. Comparable values (P0.05) for both devices were obtained for the white-to-white distance measurements. Conclusion: The Galilei G4 and Pentacam HR Scheimpflug systems cannot be used interchangeably because they produce significant measurement differences.
机译:目的:比较使用两种不同的Scheimpflug成像设备测量的眼前房深度,白到白距离,前房角和瞳孔直径。方法:该横向研究包括来自80位20至40岁受试者的80只右眼。它们的球当量范围为-4.25至+1.00屈光度(D)。使用Galilei G4(双Scheimpflug相机)和Pentacam HR(单Scheimpflug相机)系统,测量每只眼睛的前房深度,白距离,前房角和瞳孔直径的远视力。结果:当分别用Galilei G4和Pentacam HR测量时,平均前房深度分别为3.12±0.23 mm和3.19±0.24 mm。当使用Galilei G4和Pentacam HR进行测量时,测得的平均白白距离分别为11.84±0.31 mm和11.90±0.43 mm。当使用Galilei G4和Pentacam HR测量时,平均瞳孔直径分别为3.22±0.58 mm和3.22±0.52 mm。最后,使用Galilei G4测量时的平均前房角为34.30±2.86度,使用Pentacam HR测量的平均前房角为39.26±2.85度。一项比较分析表明,与Pentacam HR系统相比,Galilei G4的前房深度,前房角和瞳孔直径的测量值显着降低(P <0.05)。对于白到白距离测量,获得了两个设备的可比较值(P> 0.05)。结论:Galilei G4和Pentacam HR Scheimpflug系统不能互换使用,因为它们会产生明显的测量差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号