首页> 外文期刊>Australasian Medical Journal >Influence of different orthodontic brackets and chemical preparations of ceramic crowns on shear bond strength
【24h】

Influence of different orthodontic brackets and chemical preparations of ceramic crowns on shear bond strength

机译:不同正畸托槽和陶瓷牙冠化学制备方法对剪切粘结强度的影响

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Bonding to ceramic restorations remains a major challenge to orthodontists, especially due to an increasing number of adults seeking orthodontic treatment. Aims The objective of this research was to investigate the influence of two chemical methods used for surface conditioning of ceramic crowns, on shear bond strength (SBS) of metallic and ceramic orthodontic brackets bonded to ceramic surfaces. Methods The study was conducted on 48 prepared specimens of metallic and ceramic orthodontic brackets bonded to ceramic crowns, conditioned with two different etching materials: hydrofluoric acid (HFA), or phosphoric acid, and subsequently, silane. SBS was tested using Universal Testing Machine. The samples were analysed using Scanning Electron Microscope, to determine adhesive remnant index (ARI). Statistical data was processed with ANOVA, and ARI was evaluated using x2 test, with level of significance α=0.05. Results SBS values of the groups etched with HFA and silane, compared to the groups etched with phosphoric acid and silane, are not significantly increased. However, ceramic brackets show significantly higher SBS values than metallic brackets. Conclusion Both types of ceramic surface conditioning procedures have similar features and provide strong enough SBS values to realize the orthodontic treatment. Also, the assumption that only the type of bracket significantly affects the SBS value can be accepted.
机译:背景技术与陶瓷修复体的粘接仍然是正畸医生的主要挑战,特别是由于越来越多的成年人寻求正畸治疗。目的本研究的目的是研究两种化学方法对陶瓷冠的表面处理,对粘结在陶瓷表面的金属和陶瓷正畸托槽的剪切粘结强度(SBS)的影响。方法该研究在48个准备好的金属和陶瓷正畸托槽标本上进行,该标本用陶瓷冠粘结在一起,并用两种不同的蚀刻材料处理:氢氟酸(HFA)或磷酸,以及随后的硅烷。使用通用测试机测试了SBS。使用扫描电子显微镜分析样品,以确定粘合剂残留指数(ARI)。用ANOVA处理统计数据,并使用x2检验评估ARI,显着性水平为α= 0.05。结果与用磷酸和硅烷蚀刻的基团相比,用HFA和硅烷蚀刻的基团的SBS值没有显着增加。但是,陶瓷支架的SBS值明显高于金属支架。结论两种类型的陶瓷表面调理程序都具有相似的功能,并提供足够强的SBS值以实现正畸治疗。此外,仅括号类型会严重影响SBS值的假设也可以接受。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号