首页> 外文期刊>Asian spine journal. >Single Posterior Approach for En-Bloc Resection and Stabilization for Locally Advanced Pancoast Tumors Involving the Spine: Single Centre Experience
【24h】

Single Posterior Approach for En-Bloc Resection and Stabilization for Locally Advanced Pancoast Tumors Involving the Spine: Single Centre Experience

机译:整体后路整治和稳定化涉及脊柱的局部晚期胰腺癌的单一后路方法:单中心经验

获取原文
           

摘要

Study Design Monocentric prospective study. Purpose To assess the safety and effectiveness of the posterior approach for resection of advanced Pancoast tumors. Overview of Literature In patients with advanced Pancoast tumors invading the spine, most surgical teams consider the combined approach to be necessary for “ en-bloc ” resection to control visceral, vascular, and neurological structures. We report our preliminary experience with a single-stage posterior approach. Methods We included all patients who underwent posterior en-bloc resection of advanced Pancoast tumors invading the spine in our institution between January 2014 and May 2015. All patients had locally advanced tumors without N2 nodes or distant metastases. All patients, except 1, benefited from induction treatment consisting of a combination of concomitant chemotherapy (cisplatin-VP16) and radiation. Results Five patients were included in this study. There were 2 men and 3 women with a mean age of 55 years (range, 46–61 years). The tumor involved 2 adjacent levels in 1 patient, 3 levels in 1 patient, and 4 levels in 3 patients. There were no intraoperative complications. The mean operative time was 9 hours (range, 8–12 hours), and the mean estimated blood loss was 3.2 L (range, 1.5–7 L). No patient had a worsened neurological condition at discharge. Four complications occurred in 4 patients. Three complications required reoperation and none was lethal. The mean follow-up was 15.5 months (range, 9–24 months). Four patients harbored microscopically negative margins (R0 resection) and remained disease free. One patient harbored a microscopically positive margin (R1 resection) and exhibited local recurrence at 8 months following radiation treatment. Conclusions The posterior approach was a valuable option that avoided the need for a second-stage operation. Induction chemoradiation is highly suitable for limiting the risk of local recurrence.
机译:研究设计单中心前瞻性研究。目的评估后路手术切除晚期Pancoast肿瘤的安全性和有效性。文献综述在晚期Pancoast肿瘤侵犯脊柱的患者中,大多数外科手术团队认为联合方法对于“整体”切除以控制内脏,血管和神经系统结构是必要的。我们报告了单阶段后路手术的初步经验。方法我们收集了2014年1月至2015年5月在我院接受全脊柱晚期肿瘤行脊柱后路切除术的所有患者。所有患者均为局部晚期肿瘤,无N2淋巴结或远处转移。除1名患者外,所有患者均受益于诱导治疗,包括联合化疗(顺铂-VP16)和放疗。结果本研究纳入5例患者。男2例,女3例,平均年龄55岁(范围46-61岁)。肿瘤涉及1个患者的2个相邻级别,1个患者的3个级别和3个患者的4个级别。没有术中并发症。平均手术时间为9小时(8-12小时),平均估计失血量为3.2 L(1.5-7 L)。没有患者出院时神经系统状况恶化。 4例患者发生4例并发症。需要再次手术的三个并发症,没有一个是致命的。平均随访时间为15.5个月(范围9-24个月)。 4例患者镜下切缘阴性(R0切除),无疾病。一名患者镜下切缘阳性(R1切除),放射治疗后8个月出现局部复发。结论后路手术是一种有价值的选择,它避免了第二阶段手术的需要。感应化学辐射非常适合于限制局部复发的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号