...
首页> 外文期刊>Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia >Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy: Three different types of local anesthesia
【24h】

Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy: Three different types of local anesthesia

机译:经直肠超声(TRUS)引导下的前列腺活检:三种不同类型的局部麻醉

获取原文

摘要

Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy is regarded as the gold standard for prostate cancer diagnosis. The majority of patients perceive TRUS-guided prostate biopsy as a physically and psychologically traumatic experience. We aimed to compare in this paper the efficacy of three different anesthesia techniques to control the pain during the procedure. Materials and methods: 150 patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy were randomly divided into three groups. Group A included 50 patients who received one hour before the procedure a mixture of 2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine, Group B: 50 patients who received intrarectal local anesthetic administration (lidocaine 5 ml 10%) and lidocaine local spray 15 % and Group C included 50 patients who received periprostatic block anesthesia (lidocaine 10 ml 10%). Visual analogue scale (VAS) of patients in different groups was evaluated at the end of the biopsy and 30 minutes after the procedure. Results: The VAS of patients in Group A was 1.32 ± 0.65 (VAS I) and 2.47 ± 0.80 (VAS II). In group B the VAS of patients was 1.09 ± 0.47 (VAS I) and 1.65 ± 0.61 (VAS II). In group C the VAS of patients was 2.63 ± 0.78 (VAS I) and 1.70 ± 0.85 (VAS II). There was no statistically significant difference in term of VAS I between group A and B. A statistically significant difference was determined in terms of VAS II between group A and B. There was no statistically significant difference in term of VAS between group B and C. Conclusions: The most effective of the three methods for pain control we used was intrarectal local anesthetic administration and lidocaine local spray 15% that enables an ideal patient comfort.
机译:经直肠超声(TRUS)引导的前列腺活检被认为是诊断前列腺癌的金标准。大多数患者将TRUS引导的前列腺活检视为一种身体和心理创伤的经历。我们的目的是在本文中比较三种不同麻醉技术控制手术过程中疼痛的功效。材料与方法:150例行经直肠超声(TRUS)引导的前列腺穿刺活检的患者随机分为三组。 A组包括50位在手术前一小时接受2.5%利多卡因和2.5%丙胺卡因混合的患者,B组:50位接受直肠内局部麻醉剂(利多卡因5 ml 10%)和利多卡因局部喷雾剂15%的患者,C组包括50例接受了前列腺周围阻滞麻醉的患者(利多卡因10 ml 10%)。在活检结束时和手术后30分钟评估不同组患者的视觉模拟量表(VAS)。结果:A组患者的VAS为1.32±0.65(VAS I)和2.47±0.80(VAS II)。 B组患者的VAS为1.09±0.47(VAS I)和1.65±0.61(VAS II)。 C组患者的VAS为2.63±0.78(VAS I)和1.70±0.85(VAS II)。 A组和B组之间的VAS I术语之间无统计学意义上的差异。A组和B组之间的VAS II方面具有统计意义上的差异。B组和C组之间的VAS术语方面没有统计学上的显着差异。结论:我们使用的三种疼痛控制方法中最有效的方法是直肠内局部麻醉和15%利多卡因局部喷雾,可为患者带来理想的舒适感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号