首页> 外文期刊>Annals of King Edward Medical University. >A comparison of medical treatment versus surgical treatment for the management of Otitis media with effusion
【24h】

A comparison of medical treatment versus surgical treatment for the management of Otitis media with effusion

机译:渗出性中耳炎的内科治疗与外科治疗比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Aims and objectives: This study is designed: To assess outcome of the two modes of treatment (medical and surgical) of otitis media with effusion in terms of their effectiveness and patient compliance, and to compare in terms of side effects and complications. Sample size: Forty patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria included in the study. They were divided into two groups by random allocation of medical or surgical mode of treatment. Thus each group consisted of twenty patients. Study setting: The study was conducted in the Department of ENT Jinnah Hospital, Lahore. Results: In Medically Treated Twenty patients effusion did not resolve in most of the cases, and recovered after some time during the follow-up period. In remaining twenty patients treated surgically, there was immediate improvement in hearing in most of the patients. Conclusion: Complications rate is more in surgical treatment as compared to medical treatment. But in spite of this, surgical treatment is better option in our set-up r egarding effectiveness and patient compliance.
机译:目的和目的:本研究旨在:从有效性和患者依从性方面评估渗出性中耳炎的两种治疗方式(医学和外科),并比较副作用和并发症。样本量:满足研究纳入标准的40名患者。通过随机分配医学或外科治疗方式将其分为两组。因此,每组由二十名患者组成。研究背景:该研究在拉合尔耳鼻喉真纳医院进行。结果:在药物治疗中,二十例患者的积液在大多数情况下均未消失,并在随访期间一段时间后恢复。在通过外科手术治疗的其余二十名患者中,大多数患者的听力立即得到改善。结论:手术治疗的并发症发生率高于药物治疗。尽管如此,考虑到有效性和患者依从性,外科治疗是我们设置中更好的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号