...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Intensive Care >Reliability of respiratory pressure measurements in ventilated and non-ventilated patients in ICU: an observational study
【24h】

Reliability of respiratory pressure measurements in ventilated and non-ventilated patients in ICU: an observational study

机译:ICU中通气和非通气患者呼吸压力测量的可靠性

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract BackgroundAssessment of maximum respiratory pressures is a common practice in intensive care because it can predict the success of weaning from ventilation. However, the reliability of measurements through an intubation catheter has not been compared with standard measurements. The aim of this study was to compare maximum respiratory pressures measured through an intubation catheter with the same measurements using a standard mouthpiece in extubated patients.MethodsA prospective observational study was carried out in adults who had been under ventilation for at least 24?h and for whom extubation was planned. Maximal respiratory pressure measurements were carried out before and 24?h following extubation.ResultsNinety patients were included in the analyses (median age: 61.5?years, median SAPS2 score: 42.5 and median duration of ventilation: 7?days). Maximum respiratory pressures measured through the intubation catheter were as reliable as measurements through a standard mouthpiece (difference in maximal inspiratory pressure: mean bias?=???2.43?±?14.43 cmH2O and difference in maximal expiratory pressure: mean bias?=?1.54?±?23.2?cmH2O).ConclusionMaximum respiratory pressures measured through an intubation catheter were reliable and similar to standard measures.Clinical trial registration Retrospectively Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02363231).
机译:摘要背景最大呼吸压力的评估是重症监护中的一种常见做法,因为它可以预测通气断奶的成功率。但是,通过插管导管进行的测量的可靠性尚未与标准测量进行比较。这项研究的目的是比较在插管患者中通过插管导管测量的最大呼吸压力与使用标准烟嘴进行的相同测量。方法对通气时间至少为24?h的成年人进行了前瞻性观察研究。计划拔管的人。在拔管前和拔管后24小时进行最大呼吸压测量。结果分析了90例患者(中位年龄:61.5岁,中位SAPS2评分:42.5岁,中位通气时间:7天)。通过插管导管测得的最大呼吸压力与通过标准烟嘴测得的可靠性一样(最大吸气压力差:平均偏差?=?2.43?±?14.43 cmH2O和最大呼气压力差:平均偏差?=?1.54结论:通过插管导管测量的最大呼吸压力是可靠的,并且与标准方法相似。临床试验注册已在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT02363231)上进行了追溯注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号