...
首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques >Ambient measurements of aromatic and oxidized VOCs by PTR-MS and GC-MS: intercomparison between four instruments in a boreal forest in Finland
【24h】

Ambient measurements of aromatic and oxidized VOCs by PTR-MS and GC-MS: intercomparison between four instruments in a boreal forest in Finland

机译:通过PTR-MS和GC-MS对芳烃和氧化VOC进行环境测量:芬兰北方森林中四种仪器之间的比对

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) and gas chromatography mass spectrometry GC-MS) are commonly used methods for automated in situmeasurements of various volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the atmosphere.In order to investigate the reliability of such measurements, we operatedfour automated analyzers using their normal field measurement protocol sideby side at a boreal forest site. We measured methanol, acetaldehyde, acetone,benzene and toluene by two PTR-MS and two GC-MS instruments. The measurementswere conducted in southern Finland between 13 April and 14 May 2012. Thispaper presents correlations and biases between the concentrations measuredusing the four instruments. A very good correlation was found for benzene andacetone measurements between all instruments (the mean R value was 0.88 forboth compounds), while for acetaldehyde and toluene the correlation wasweaker (with a mean R value of 0.50 and 0.62, respectively). For somecompounds, notably for methanol, there were considerable systematicdifferences in the mixing ratios measured by the different instruments,despite the very good correlation between the instruments (mean R = 0.90).The systematic difference manifests as a difference in the linear regressionslope between measurements conducted between instruments, rather than as anoffset. This mismatch indicates that the systematic uncertainty in thesensitivity of a given instrument can lead to an uncertainty of 50–100 %in the methanol emissions measured by commonly used methods.
机译:质子转移反应质谱法(PTR-MS)和气相色谱质谱法(GC-MS)是用于大气中各种挥发性有机化合物(VOC)的自动现场测量的常用方法,为了研究此类测量的可靠性,我们在北部森林地带并排使用其常规田间测量规程操作了四台自动分析仪。我们通过两台PTR-MS和两台GC-MS仪器测量了甲醇,乙醛,丙酮,苯和甲苯。测量是在2012年4月13日至5月14日在芬兰南部进行的。本文介绍了使用这四种仪器测得的浓度之间的相关性和偏差。在所有仪器之间,苯和丙酮的测量值均具有很好的相关性(两种化合物的平均 R 值均为0.88),而乙醛和甲苯的相关性则较弱(平均值为 R 分别大于> 0.50和0.62的值)。对于某些化合物,尤其是甲醇,不同仪器测量的混合比存在相当大的系统差异,尽管各仪器之间具有很好的相关性(均值 R = 0.90)。系统差异表现为差异在仪器之间进行的测量之间的线性回归斜率中,而不是作为偏移量。这种不匹配表明,给定仪器灵敏度的系统不确定性可能导致通过常用方法测得的甲醇排放不确定性为50–100%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号