...
首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques >Differences in liquid cloud droplet effective radius and number concentration estimates between MODIS collections 5.1 and 6 over global oceans
【24h】

Differences in liquid cloud droplet effective radius and number concentration estimates between MODIS collections 5.1 and 6 over global oceans

机译:全球海洋上的MODIS 5.1和6号集之间的液态云滴有效半径和数量浓度估计值的差异

获取原文
           

摘要

Differences in cloud droplet effective radius and cloud droplet number concentration (CDNC) estimates inferred from the Aqua–MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) collections 5.1 (C5.1) and 6 (C6) cloud products (MYD06) are examined for warm clouds over global oceans for the year 2008. Individual pixel level retrievals for both collections are aggregated to 1°??×??1° and compared globally and regionally for the three main spectral channel pairs used for MODIS cloud optical property retrievals. Comparisons between both collections are performed for cases in which all three effective radii retrievals are classified by the MODIS cloud product as valid. The contribution to the observed differences of several key MYD06 Collection 6 algorithm updates are also explored, with a focus on changes to the surface reflectance model, assumed solar irradiance, above-cloud emission, cloud-top pressure (CTP), and pixel registration. Global results show a neutral to positive (&?50?cmsup?3/sup) change for C6-derived CDNC relative to C5.1 for the 1.6 and 2.1?μm channel retrievals, corresponding to a neutral to ?2?μm difference in droplet effective radius (ir/isube/sub). For 3.7?μm retrievals, CDNC results show a negative change in the tropics, with differences transitioning toward positive values with increasing latitude spanning ?25 to +50?cmsup?3/sup related to a +2.5 to ?1?μm transition in effective radius. Cloud optical thickness (iτ/i) differences were small relative to effective radius and found to not significantly impact CDNC estimates. Regionally, the magnitude and behavior of the annual CDNC cycle are compared for each effective radius retrieval. Results from this study indicate significant inter-collection differences in aggregated values of effective radius due to changes to the precomputed retrieval lookup tables (LUTs) for ocean scenes, changes to retrieved cloud-top pressure, solar irradiance, or above-cloud thermal emission, depending upon spectral channel. The observed differences between collections may have implications for existing MODIS-derived climatologies and validation studies of effective radius and CDNC.
机译:根据Aqua-MODIS(中等分辨率成像光谱仪)集合5.1(C5.1)和6(C6)的云产品(MYD06)得出的云滴有效半径和云滴数浓度(CDNC)估计值的差异,检查了上方的暖云2008年的全球海洋。两个集合的单个像素级取回总和为1°××Δ1°,并在全球和区域范围内比较了用于MODIS云光学特性检索的三个主要光谱通道对。对于MODIS云产品将所有三个有效半径检索都归类为有效的情况,将执行两个集合之间的比较。还探讨了MYD06 Collection 6几个关键算法更新对观察到的差异的贡献,重点在于表面反射率模型,假定的太阳辐射,云层上方发射,云层顶压力(CTP)和像素配准的变化。整体结果显示,对于1.6和2.1?μm的通道取回,C6衍生的CDNC相对于C5.1为中性到正(> 50?cm ?3 )变化,对应于液滴有效半径( r e )的差为?2?μm。对于3.7?m的回波,CDNC结果显示热带地区出现负变化,随着纬度从25到+50?cm ?3 的增加(与+2.5到+1相关),差异向正值转变。有效半径过渡为?μm。相对于有效半径,云的光学厚度(τ)差异较小,并且发现不会显着影响CDNC估计。在区域上,比较每个有效半径检索的年度CDNC周期的大小和行为。这项研究的结果表明,由于更改了海洋场景的预先计算的取回查询表(LUT),取回的云顶压力,太阳辐照度或云层上方的热辐射发生了变化,有效半径的合计值之间存在明显的馆际差异,取决于光谱通道。观测到的集合之间的差异可能对现有的MODIS派生气候和有效半径和CDNC的验证研究有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号